Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 31;36(10):2139–2145. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1615-5

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics, follow-up duration and time to removal for both treatment groups

Plate group, n = 43 ESIN group, n = 47 p value
Age, years (mean ±SD) 39.4 ± 14.1 33.1 ± 15.6 p = 0.049
Gender, n (%) Male 33 (77) 33 (70) p = 0.48
Female 10 (23) 14 (30)
Fracture side, n (%) Right 20 (47) 19 (40) p = 0.56
Left 23 (54) 28 (60)
AO Classification, n (%) A1 p = 0.11
A2 11 (26) 22 (47)
A3 8 (19) 7 (15)
B1 1 (2) 0
B2 17 (4%) 14 (30)
B3 2 (5) 4 (9)
C1 1 (2) 0
C2 3 (7) 0
C3
Trauma mechanism, n (%) Traffic accident 9 (21) 12 (26) p = 0.81
Sports 18 (42) 18 (38)
Fall 13 (30) 12 (26)
Unknowna 3 (7) 5 (11)
Neurovascular injury, n (%) 0 2 (4) p = 0.23
Unknowna 3 (7) 9 (19)
Imminent skin perforation, n (%) 1 (2) 2 (4) p = 0.61
Unknowna 3 (7) 9 (19)
Follow-up time, months (median, IQR) 8 (2–13) 6 (5–12) p = 0.76
Time to removal, months (median, IQR) 11 (7–15) 5 (4–6) p = < 0.001

TEN titanium elastic nail, SD standard deviation, AO Classification Müller AO Classification for Fractures—Long Bones, ESIN elastic stable intramedullary nailing

aWas not reported in documentation