Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 31;36(10):2139–2145. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1615-5

Table 3.

Major and minor complications in both treatment groups

Major complications Plate group, n = 43 ESIN group, n = 47 p value
At least 1 implant failurea, n (%) 6 (14) 1 (2) p = 0.051
Major revision surgery, n (%) 5 (12) 1 (2) p = 0.100
Refracture after implant removal, n (%) 3 (7) 0 p = 0.105
Minor complications
 Superficial infection, n (%) 1 (2) 4 (9) p = 0.363
 At least one irritation, n (%) 19b (44) 29b (62) p = 0.096
 Pain after 6 months, n (%) 4 (9) 2 (4)
 Temporary brachial plexus lesion, n (%) 0 2 (4)
 Hyperaesthesia, n (%) 3 (7) 0
 Plate irritation, n (%) 17 (40)
 Medial TEN protrusion, n (%) 23 (49)
 Lateral TEN protrusion, n (%) 3 (6)
 Minor revision surgery (shortening of TEN), n (%) 0 6 (13) p = 0.027

TEN titanium elastic nail, ESIN elastic stable intramedullary nailing

aOne patient experienced two implant fractures

bSome patients experienced more than one irritation problem