Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 16;11:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-48

Table 2.

Fragment of the best results obtained for “w” features (marked with black dots on the graph - Figure12), for a typical and trimmed classification tree and classification errorsTP,FN,TN,FPwith the number of tree nodes

 
 w
 Tree typical
 Tree cut
No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TP FN TN FP node ACC[%] FN  +  FP[%] TP FN TN FP node ACC[%] FN  +  FP[%]
143
 1
 1
 1
 1
 0
 0
 0
 1
 0
 0
 124
 6
 52
 6
 41
 94
 6.38
 123
 7
 46
 12
 21
 90
 10.11
822
 0
 1
 1
 0
 1
 1
 0
 0
 1
 1
 125
 5
 55
 3
 43
 96
 4.26
 123
 7
 46
 12
 21
 90
 10.11
647
 1
 1
 1
 0
 0
 0
 0
 1
 0
 1
 120
 10
 54
 4
 39
 93
 7.45
 124
 6
 44
 14
 21
 89
 10.64
759
 1
 1
 1
 0
 1
 1
 1
 1
 0
 1
 125
 5
 51
 7
 41
 94
 6.38
 125
 5
 43
 15
 21
 89
 10.64
786
 0
 1
 0
 0
 1
 0
 0
 0
 1
 1
 127
 3
 49
 9
 45
 94
 6.38
 124
 6
 44
 14
 21
 89
 10.64
912
 0
 0
 0
 0
 1
 0
 0
 1
 1
 1
 126
 4
 51
 7
 47
 94
 5.85
 127
 3
 40
 18
 19
 89
 11.17
984
 0
 0
 0
 1
 1
 0
 1
 1
 1
 1
 127
 3
 48
 10
 43
 93
 6.91
 124
 6
 43
 15
 19
 89
 11.17
620
 0
 0
 1
 1
 0
 1
 1
 0
 0
 1
 127
 3
 46
 12
 33
 92
 7.98
 124
 6
 42
 16
 21
 88
 11.7
941
 1
 0
 1
 1
 0
 1
 0
 1
 1
 1
 127
 3
 50
 8
 43
 94
 5.85
 122
 8
 44
 14
 21
 88
 11.7
1010
 0
 1
 0
 0
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 124
 6
 49
 9
 37
 92
 7.98
 123
 7
 43
 15
 19
 88
 11.7
135
 1
 1
 1
 0
 0
 0
 0
 1
 0
 0
 124
 6
 52
 6
 41
 94
 6.38
 123
 7
 42
 16
 17
 88
 12.23
167
 1
 1
 1
 0
 0
 1
 0
 1
 0
 0
 115
 15
 56
 2
 33
 91
 9.04
 123
 7
 42
 16
 17
 88
 12.23
710
 0
 1
 1
 0
 0
 0
 1
 1
 0
 1
 123
 7
 50
 8
 37
 92
 7.98
 127
 3
 38
 20
 17
 88
 12.23
873 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 127 3 47 11 41 93 7.45 124 6 41 17 21 88 12.23