Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Nov;40(8):1301–1312. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9641-8

Table 2.

Synopsis of Confirmatory Factor Models Informing the Structure of ADHD Symptoms at Each Assessment

Age Factors χ2 df CFI RMSEA Comparison of Factors Δχ2 Δdf Δp
3 years 1 510.2 135 0.97 0.05 1 vs. 2 1.0 1 0.3173
2 511.7 134 0.97 0.05 2 vs. 3 23.8 2 < .0001
3 492.6 132 0.97 0.05 1 vs. 3 24.1 3 < .0001

4 years 1 351.3 135 0.98 0.04 1 vs. 2 2.1 1 0.1485
2 351.4 134 0.98 0.04 2 vs. 3 17.4 2 0.0002
3 335.3 132 0.96 0.04 1 vs. 3 19.2 3 0.0003

5 years 1 319.9 135 0.99 0.04 1 vs. 2 3.3 1 0.0705
2 319.0 134 0.99 0.04 2 vs. 3 20.6 2 < .0001
3 297.9 132 0.99 0.03 1 vs. 3 21.3 3 0.0001

Note. All tests of perfect fit were significant at p < .0001; the columns indicating changes in chi-square (Δχ2), degrees of freedom (Δdf), and probability (Δp) refer to tests between models that imposed a different number of factors (e.g., the last four columns of the first row of the table provide a formal comparison of whether the 2-factor model provides a statistically significant improvement in fit relative to the 1-factor model for the age 3 data).