Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2010 May 8;400(3):335–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.049

Table 4. Structure and sequence comparisons of sensors having a double-PDC fold.

Z2 Z3 Z6 Z8 Z16 KinD DctB
(vc)
DctB
(sm)
LuxQ
(vh)
LuxQ
(vc)
McpX
Z2 0.98 1.96 2.86 2.19 2.28 2.33 2.18 3.72 3.82 2.10
Z3 424 1.83 2.86 2.16 2.30 2.43 2.27 3.58 3.68 1.97
Z6 40.4 40 2.86 2.15 2.35 2.31 2.13 3.92 4.01 2.26
Z8 14.6 18.1 17.7 2.91 2.82 2.72 2.84 4.07 4.14 2.87
Z16 17.3 18.5 17.3 25 1.86 2.01 1.83 3.94 4.09 2.25
KinD 16.9 15.8 14.2 26.9 38.1 1.92 1.79 3.84 3.89 2.23
vcDctB 16.9 10 15.8 18.5 14.2 17.3 1.35 3.67 3.71 2.36
smDctB 14.6 15.8 16.9 15.0 18.5 13.5 119 3.69 3.80 2.18
vhLuxQ 13.9 21.6 11.9 15 10.8 15.4 13.9 16.9 1.15 2.60
vcLuxQ 13.9 21.6 10.8 15.0 12.3 15.0 13.9 18.5 174 3.69
McpX 50.4 55.1 20.8 11.9 26.6 16.9 15.4 12.7 9.6 9.6

RMSD values (upper triangle) and Blastp Z-scores (lower triangle) are shown for pair-wise comparisons of all sensors with double-PDC fold in the PDB. The PDB code of Z2, Z3, Z6, Z8, Z16, KinD, vcDctB, smDctB, vhLuxQ, vcLuxQ and McpX are 3LI9, 3LIB, 3LIC, 3LID, 3LIF, 3fos, 3by9, 3e4p, 2hje, 3c38, and 3c8c, respectively.