Table 3.
Predictors of Improved RIBS Score (binary yes/no) (n = 83)
| Individual social contact elements |
Individual social contact elements |
Individual social contact elements |
Individual social contact elements |
Additive social contact |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI) | |
| Age |
1.1 (1.0, 1.1) |
1.1 (1.0, 1.1) |
1.1(1.0, 1.1) |
1.1 (1.0, 1.1) |
1.1 (1.0, 1.1) |
| Gender |
1.5 (0.2, 9.9) |
2.0 (0.3, 2.8) |
1.6 (0.2, 0.7) |
1.8 (0.3, 2.7) |
1.6 (0.2, 1.0) |
| BME |
5.6 (1.0, 31.5) |
6.1 (1.1, 33.3) |
6.7 (1.1, 9.2) |
6.0 (1.1, 3.1) |
6.1 (1.1, 4.5) |
| Experience of Mental Health Problems (yes/no) |
2.0 (0.4, 10.0) |
2.7 (0.5, 13.6) |
2.5 (0.5, 12.4) |
2.1 (0.4, 10.8) |
2.3 (0.5, 11.6) |
| Facilitating Social contact Factorsa |
|
|
|
|
|
| Equal Status Common |
2.4 (0.7, 7.7) |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Goals |
-- |
2.0 (0.9, 4.7) |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Intergroup cooperation |
-- |
-- |
*2.5 (1.1, 5.9) |
-- |
-- |
| Friendship potential |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2.8 (0.6, 11.8) |
-- |
| Quality of Social contact (Number of factors) |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
*1.4 (1.0, 1.8) |
| Initial RIBS Score |
1.0 (0.8, 1.3) |
1.0 (0.8, 1.3) |
1.0 (0.8, 1.3) |
1.0 (0.8, 1.3) |
1.0 (0.8, 1.3) |
| Initial willingness to disclose | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) |
p < 0.05
afacilitating social contact conditions refer tothe specific conditions theorised by Allport and Pettigrew as being associated with optimal social contact