Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 1;7(10):e45409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045409

Table 3. Comparison of disease activity over 2 years in placebo SPMS versus placebo PPMS by various definitions of intermittent activity, progression, and improvement.

SPMS (%) PPMS (%) p-value
Average of Intermittent Activity (median) a 21.6 19.9
MRI 64.6 68.0 0.79b
EDSS Total Score 28.2 32.1 0.74
EDSS Cerebral 24.3 14.2 0.21
EDSS Visual 20.9 11.9 0.22
EDSS Brain Stem 19.9 19.4 1
EDSS Pyramidal 3.4 7.5 0.38
EDSS Sensory 14.1 22.4 0.24
EDSS Cerebellar 22.3 19.4 0.79
EDSS Bowel & Bladder 17.5 11.2 0.38
T25FW 50.0 48.4 0.94
9HP 32.4 20.3 0.17
PASAT 20.4 30.6 0.22
MRI Progression c
1 (≥1 SD) 1.9 1.6 1
2 (≥0.5 SD) 6.5 5.5 0.92
3 (≥0.25 SD) 36.8 26.6 0.28
Average of Clinical Progression 1 (median) 11.8 13.4
EDSS Total Score 19.2 22.5 0.75
EDSS Cerebral 7.8 11.4 0.67
EDSS Visual 14.9 9.1 0.38
EDSS Brain Stem 11.9 6.1 0.31
EDSS Pyramidal 11.3 13.4 0.80
EDSS Sensory 6.0 19.5 0.008*
EDSS Cerebellar 15.6 17.2 0.94
EDSS Bowel & Bladder 16.1 14.4 0.94
T25FW 19.8 29.8 0.22
9HP 10.7 6.2 0.42
PASAT 1.5 1.5 1
Average of Clinical Progression 2 (median) 12.3 14.4
EDSS Total Score 19.1 23.2 0.70
EDSS Cerebral 6.7 9.6 0.70
EDSS Visual 12.3 12.0 1
EDSS Brain Stem 11.8 7.2 0.55
EDSS Pyramidal 8.2 11.2 0.74
EDSS Sensory 7.7 19.2 0.04*
EDSS Cerebellar 10.8 19.4 0.22
EDSS Bowel & Bladder 13.3 12.8 1
T25FW 58.5 56.5 0.94
9HP 58.7 40.5 0.04*
PASAT 22.6 14.4 0.29
Average of Clinical Improvement (median) 13.6 12.4
EDSS Total Score 5.3 4.1 0.94
EDSS Cerebral 13.6 16.5 0.75
EDSS Visual 14.7 20.7 0.50
EDSS Brain Stem 16.2 13.2 0.75
EDSS Pyramidal 9.5 12.4 0.74
EDSS Sensory 22.0 9.9 0.07
EDSS Cerebellar 17.5 18.2 0.99
EDSS Bowel & Bladder 22.5 15.7 0.40
T25FW 2.3 4.7 0.65
9HP 0.0 0.9 0.70
PASAT 5.3 10.1 0.42
a

For each clinical disease activity pattern (intermittent, clinical progression 1, clinical progression 2, and improvement) we present the median percentage as an average of all the measurements within each category.

b

All P values have been adjusted for multiple comparisons.

c

Brain parenchymal fraction (BFP) was measured in IMPACT study while whole brain volume was measured in OLYMPUS study. For the purpose of multiple comparison correction, MRI progression was considered as a single variable (with MRI progression 1, 2, and 3 being presented as a sensitivity analysis).