Abstract
Microwave-assisted synthesis of macrocyclic diaryl ethers via intramolecular and/or bimolecular Ullmann coupling is described. Using the optimized conditions, a panel of macrocycles, with different substitution patterns, ring sizes, and linkers, has been successfully synthesized using microwave irradiation. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first examples of the microwave-assisted synthesis of macrocyclic diaryl ethers via intramolecular and/or bimolecular Ullmann coupling.
Keywords: Microwave-assisted synthesis, Macrocycle, Diaryl ether, Intramolecular, Bimolecular, Ullmann coupling
Macrocyclic diaryl ether motifs are commonly found in naturally occurring molecules (Figure 1) and have been reported to mediate a broad range of biological activities.1 The Ullmann coupling reaction of phenols and aryl halides has been widely used for the synthesis of diaryl ethers since its discovery; however, the scope of Ullmann coupling has been limited by harsh reaction conditions (e.g., high temperature and long reaction time) and low reaction yields.2 Therefore, much effort has been devoted to the modifications of this classical coupling reaction.3 For example, the generality has been improved by the introduction of palladium catalysts4 and with the assistance of novel ligands such as N,N-dimethylglycine5 and biarylphosphine.6 So far, however, most improvements have been achieved with the intermolecular Ullmann coupling of small molecular aryl halides with phenols.
Figure 1.

Representative examples of diaryl ether-based natural products.
The application of microwave (MW) irradiation in promoting organic reactions has been demonstrated successfully in recent years.7 It has been shown in many studies that MW irradiation can accelerate reaction rates and improve chemical yields. MW heating has also been explored for intermolecular Ullmann reactions8 and for the synthesis of diversified macrocycles based on ring-closing metathesis (RCM),9 Suzuki-Miyaura crosscoupling, 10 and solution and solid-phase synthesis of cyclic peptides and peptidomimetics.11 However, no reports have been found in the literature concerning MW-assisted intramolecular Ullmann macrocyclization. During the course of our continued effort to synthesize diaryl ether macrocycles, we reported recently the first total synthesis of macrocyclic engelhardione using a sealed pressure tube which led ultimately to the structural revision of its published structure.12 To further improve the efficiency and to develop a modular synthesis of diaryl etherbased macrocycles, MW methodology has been applied to the intramolecular Ullmann reaction. Herein the synthesis of a panel of macrocycles with different substitution patterns, ring sizes, and linkers via the MW-assisted Ullmann cross-coupling is reported (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

MW-assisted synthesis of macrocycles via intramolecular and/or bimolecular Ullmann reaction.
To screen the reaction conditions, the macrocyclization of 1,7-diarylheptan-3-one 1a to 2a (Table 1) was selected as a model reaction. The reaction was conducted under an array of different conditions, including conventional heating, sealed pressure tube, and MW irradiation; the results are shown in Table 1. As noted previously,12 the reaction proceeded slowly under reflux at 150 °C for 20 h to give the macrocyclic product 2a in 33% yield (entry 1). An improved yield and a significant decrease in reaction time were observed when the reaction was conducted in a sealed pressure tube. The reaction was completed after 4.5 h at 175 °C and 1 h at 200 °C to provide 2a in 52% and 44% yields, respectively (entries 2 and 3). Using the optimized reaction conditions in a sealed tube as a starting point, further improvement was achieved when the reaction was performed using MW irradiation. When the macrocyclization step was initially performed at 175 °C using MW heating, approximately 5% of 2a was produced after 10 min based on HPLC monitoring of the reaction mixture with the remaining as the unreacted 1a. After the temperature was increased to 200 °C, similar to the reaction in a sealed tube, the reaction was completed in 1 h with a much higher yield (73% vs 44%, entries 6 and 3). Further improved results were obtained when the temperature was raised to 220 °C, the reaction finished after 35 min in excellent yield (85%, entry 7). In contrast, the cyclic reaction was completed in 15 min at 230 °C, affording 2a in a comparable yield (76%, entry 8).
Table 1.
Optimization of intramolecular macrocyclic Ullmann couplinga
With the optimized MW conditions in hand, a panel of different substrates 1b-r14 containing diverse phenol and aryl bromide moieties was employed to evaluate the scope and generality of this macrocyclic Ullmann condensation reaction; the results are shown in Table 2. Initially, a set of substrates 1b-f with a seven-carbon linker was investigated (entries 2-6). Consistent with the meta-meta substituted 2a with a 14-membered ring (entry 1), the O-MOM protected 2b was obtained in 85% yield using MW irradiation for 40 min (entry 2). In contrast, a lower yield (63%) of 2b was isolated using a sealed tube at 175 °C for 4 h. As expected, intramolecular 15-membered macrocycles 2c-d were obtained for the para-meta and meta-para substituted substrates 1c-d in 44% and 69% yields, respectively (entries 3-4). It is worth noting that these yields under MW irradiation have been improved than reported yields (12% and 50%, respectively) using sealed tubes.13 A similar result was anticipated for the meta-ortho substituted substrate 1e; surprisingly, the dimeric macrocycle 3e was isolated as a major product15 (21% yield) together with the intramolecular cyclic product 2e in 10% yield (entry 5).
Table 2.
MW-assisted synthesis of macrocycles via intramolecular and/or bimolecular Ullmann chemistrya
| Entry | Substrate | Time | Product | Yield (%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
35 min |
|
85 |
| 2 |
|
40 min |
|
85 (63c) |
| 3 |
|
35 min |
|
44 (12d) |
| 4 |
|
40 min |
|
69 (50d) |
| 5 |
|
1.5 h |
|
21e |
| 6 |
|
1 h |
|
11e |
| 7 |
|
40 min |
|
85 (28f) |
| 8 |
|
50 min |
|
83 |
| 9 |
|
40 min |
|
73 |
| 10 |
|
2.5 h |
|
28 (7g) |
| 11 |
|
5 h |
|
18 |
| 12 |
|
2.5 h |
|
18 |
| 13 |
|
40 min |
|
48 |
| 14 |
|
40 min |
|
56 |
| 15 |
|
1.5 h |
|
44 |
| 16 |
|
6 h |
|
16 |
| 17 |
|
2 h | 0h | |
| 18 |
|
1 h |
|
25 |
All experiments were performed using 0.08 mmol of substrate 1, 0.2 mmol of CuO, 0.08 mmol of K2CO3, and 4 mL of pyridine. Reaction mixtures were heated to 230 °C (220 °C for entries 1-3 and 18) using Biotage Initiator 8 Exp Microwave System and monitored by analytical HPLC.
Isolated yield based on flash column chromatography on silica gel.
Isolated yield using a sealed tube at 175 °C for 4 h.
Reported yields using sealed tubes in the same reaction system, see ref 13.
Intramolecular Ullmann coupling products 2e and 2f were also obtained in 10% and 9% yields, respectively.
Reaction was performed in a higher concentration (using 0.4 mmol of 1g, 1 mmol of CuO, 0.4 mmol of K2CO3, and 4 mL of pyridine) and completed in 15 min.
Reaction was performed under conventional reflux and was completed after 46 h.
Reaction mixture was heated at 220 °C for 1 h, and then at 230 °C for another 1 h.
To further investigate the effect of the linker flexibility on the outcome of macrocylization, the substrate 1f with a more rigid ketone-conjugated linker was explored, and, as expected, a dramatic decrease of reactivity and reaction yield were noted compared to its close analogue 1a; again, both the dimeric macrocycle 3f and the intramolecular coupling product 2f were afforded in 11% and 9% yields, respectively (entry 6).
Next, the macrocyclization reaction for a second set of substrates with a shorter five-carbon linker was examined and, again, in the case of the meta-meta substituted substrate 1g, the intramolecular Ullmann coupling proceeded smoothly to give the 12-membered macrocycle 2g in 40 min in 85% yield (entry 7). Comparable and consistent results were obtained for the meta-meta substituted 1h-i with only one substituted MeO group affording the identical macrocycles 2h-i in good yields (entries 8-9). However, interesting results were obtained for the other fivecarbon linked substrates 1j-l with the para-meta, meta-para, and meta-ortho substitution patterns (entries 10-12). In all cases, the substrates 1j-l were much less reactive than 1g-i under the same MW conditions and the bimolecular macrocyclization products 3j-l were obtained in 18-28% yields after prolonged reaction times (2.5-5 h);15 no intramolecular Ullmann coupling products were observed (entries 10-12). The formation of the dimeric cyclic products is presumably due to further reduced conformational flexibility of the substrates and unfavorable ring strains needed to perform the intramolecular coupling. Instead, the alternative intermolecular Ullmann coupling occurred first, followed by the bimolecular macrocyclization. In comparison, only 7% of 3j was isolated for the reaction performed under conventional reflux for 46 h (entry 10). Moreover, to study the potential effect of the carbonyl group in the linker on macrocyclization, reactions of the corresponding reduced variants 1m-o with the racemic alcohol functionalities were carried out, and both reactions of 1m-n afforded the expected intramolecular cyclic products 2m-n in moderate and lower yields by comparing entries 13 and 14 with corresponding entries 7 and 9. These data are consistent with the previous reports indicating that the ketone functionality may play a role in controling the substrate’s conformation and facilitating subsequent polyketide macrocyclization.16 In the case of 1o, it should be noted that the introduction of the secondary alcohol functionality appeared to facilitate the intermolecular coupling and subsequent bimolecular macrocyclization and the reaction was completed in a much shorter time (1.5 h vs 5 h), giving the bimolecular macrocycle 3o in a higher yield (44% vs 18%) compared to 1k (entries 15 and 11).
The cyclizations of the substrates 1p-r with an even shorter three-carbon linker were then studied. Different from its close analogues 1a and 1h with a longer seven- and five-carbon linker, the intermolecular cyclization product 3p was obtained in low yield (16%) for the reaction of the meta-meta substituted substrate 1p (entry 16), whereas the intramolecular macrocycle 2r was afforded in 25% yield for the reaction of the ortho-ortho substituted substrate 1r (entry 18); however, under the same MW conditions, no product was isolated from the reaction of 1q with OH and Br groups in ortho and meta positions, respectively (entry 17). The observed decrease in reactivity is presumably due to further restricted conformational flexibility originating from the conjugated ketone and unfavorable ring strains. Finally, to test the effect of concentration on the outcome of macrocyclization, the reaction of 1g with a five-fold higher concentration (0.4 M) was tried. It was found that the intramolecular coupling product 2g was obtained as a sole product despite a much lower yield (28%, entry 7),17 and no intermolecular cyclization product was observed.
The macrocycles 2 and 3 were characterized by 1H, 13C and 2D NMR spectroscopy, and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The structures of the intramolecular product 2a and the bimolecular macrocycle 3j were confirmed by X-ray crystallography, their ORTEP drawings are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.18,19
Figure 2.

ORTEP view of the molecular structure of 2a at 100 K; 30% probability ellipsoids are shown.18
Figure 3.

ORTEP views using 30% probability ellipsoids at 90 K of the two crystallographically independent molecules of 3j in the unit cell; each has inversion centers.19
In summary, a modular MW-assisted synthesis has been developed for the intramolecular and/or bimolecular Ullmann condensation of macrocyclic diaryl ethers. Under the optimized MW irradiation conditions, improved yields and shorter reaction times of intramolecular Ullmann coupling were noted compared with conventional heating and sealed tubes. These data show that the outcome of intramolecular and/or bimolecular macrocyclization depends on the linker length and substitution patterns of the substrates. This study further demonstrates that the 14- and 12-membered intramolecular macrocyclization proceeded more favorably for the meta-meta substituted substrates. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first examples of the MW-assisted synthesis of macrocycles via the Ullmann coupling chemistry. Further biological testing is warranted to screen these macrocyclic novel chemical entities as potential pharmacological tools and/or useful molecular probes.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) (R15AI092315) and UHH CoP startup funds. We thank Drs. B. Clark and R. Borris at UHH CoP for the assistance with HRMS analysis of macrocyclic compounds. We also thank Dr. A. Wright at UHH CoP for his NMR assistance.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errorsmaybe discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Supplementary Material
Experimental procedures and characterization data, copies of NMR spectra and HPLC chromatographs associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
- 1.(a) Pitsinos EN, Vidali VP, Couladouros EA. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011;2011:1207. [Google Scholar]; (b) Lakshmi Niranjan Reddy V, Ravinder K, Srinivasulu M, Venkateshwar Goud T, Malla Reddy S, Srujankumar D, Prabhakar Rao T, Suryanarayana Murty U, Venkateswarlu Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 2003;51:1081. doi: 10.1248/cpb.51.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lin J, Zhang W, Jiang N, Niu Z, Bao K, Zhang L, Liu D, Pan C, Yao X. J. Nat. Prod. 2008;71:1938. doi: 10.1021/np800226n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ley SV, Thomas AW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5400. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Marcoux J-F, Doye S, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:10539. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hassan J, Sévignon M, Gozzi C, Schulz E, Lemaire M. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:1359. doi: 10.1021/cr000664r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cai Q, Zou B, Ma D. Angew. Chem. 2006;118:1298. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burgos CH, Barder TE, Huang X, Buchwald SL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:4321. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ma D, Cai Q. Org. Lett. 2003;5:3799. doi: 10.1021/ol0350947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salvi L, Davis NR, Ali SZ, Buchwald SL. Org. Lett. 2012;14:170. doi: 10.1021/ol202955h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Kappe CO. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:6250. doi: 10.1002/anie.200400655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Larhed M, Moberg C, Hallberg A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002;35:717. doi: 10.1021/ar010074v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Dallinger D, Kappe CO. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:2563. doi: 10.1021/cr0509410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lew A, Krutzik PO, Hart ME, Chamberlin AR. J. Comb. Chem. 2001;4:95. doi: 10.1021/cc010048o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) He H, Wu Y-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:3445. [Google Scholar]; (b) Baqi Y, Müller CE. Org. Lett. 2007;9:1271. doi: 10.1021/ol070102v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) D’Angelo ND, Peterson JJ, Booker SK, Fellows I, Dominguez C, Hungate R, Reider PJ, Kim T-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:5045. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lipshutz BH, Unger JB, Taft BR. Org. Lett. 2007;9:1089. doi: 10.1021/ol0700409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Chapman RN, Arora PS. Org. Lett. 2006;8:5825. doi: 10.1021/ol062443z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pérez-Balado C, Nebbioso A, Rodríguez-Graña P, Minichiello A, Miceli M, Altucci L, de Lera ÁR. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:2497. doi: 10.1021/jm070028m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Afonso A, Feliu L, Planas M. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:2238. [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Cini E, Botta CB, Rodriquez M, Taddei M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:7159. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nnanabu E, Burgess K. Org. Lett. 2006;8:1259. doi: 10.1021/ol052867d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shen L, Sun D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:4570. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.06.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bryant VC, Kishore Kumar GD, Nyong AM, Natarajan A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:245. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Substrates were synthesized according to the previously reported procedures12 or based on the simple modifications of available synthetic schemes (see Supporting Information for details).
- 15.For related observations with a bimolecular cyclization lactone product, see: Nakahara A, Kanbe M, Nakada M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:1518. For a bimolecular cyclization lactam product, see: Boger DL, Yohannes D, Zhou J, Patane MA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:3420.
- 16.(a) Pinto A, Wang M, Horsman M, Boddy CN. Org. Lett. 2012;14:2278. doi: 10.1021/ol300707j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Aldrich CC, Venkatraman L, Sherman DH, Fecik RA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:8910. doi: 10.1021/ja0504340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.A lower yield at higher concentration was also noted previously in the synthesis of a similar ring-closing system by the Zhu group, see: Gonzalez GI, Zhu J. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:914. doi: 10.1021/jo981844s.
- 18.Crystal data for 2a: C21H24O4, Mr = 340.42, orthorhombic space group Pna21, a = 9.6740(3) Ǻ, b = 10.5427(3) Ǻ, c = 17.4091(5) Ǻ, V = 1775.56(8) Ǻ3, Z = 4, ρ = 1.273 Mg/m3, T = 100 K, in the final least-squares refinement cycles on F, the model converged at R1 = 0.041, wR2 = 0.035 and GOF = 1.976 for 1820 reflections with I > 4σ(I). Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for 2a (CCDC 878805 and 3j (CCDC 878806) have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK, (fax: +44-(0)1223-336033 or deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.Uk).
- 19.Crystal data for 3j: C38H40O8, Mr = 624.73, triclinic space group P, a = 8.1476(2) Ǻ, b = 13.7924(3) Ǻ, c = 14.9725(3) Ǻ, α = 79.7461(15)°, β = 74.6022(12)°, γ = 74.1882(15)°, V = 1550.60(6) Ǻ3, Z = 2, ρ = 1.338 Mg/m3, T = 90 K, in the final least-squares refinement cycles on F, the model converged at R1 = 0.043, wR2 = 0.064 and GOF = 1.556 for 5157 reflections with I > 5σ(I).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
