Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2012 Jan;55(1):184–191. doi: 10.1002/hep.24616

Table 3.

Functional status of patients with cirrhosis and comparison group1

Variable Cirrhosis Cases (n=317) Comparison group (n=951) P-value

# of impaired ADLs
    0 195 (61.5) 722 (75.9) <0.001
    1-3 79 (24.9) 166 (17.5)
    4-6 43 (13.6) 63 (6.6)

Type of ADL impairment
    Walking across room 63 (19.9) 110 (11.6) 0.001
    Dressing 76 (24.0) 139 (14.6) <0.001
    Bathing 71 (22.4) 114 (12.0) <0.001
    Transferring 46 (14.6) 86 (9.1) 0.005
    Toileting 52 (16.5) 91 (9.6) <0.001
    Eating 36 (11.4) 58 (6.1) 0.002

Loss of ADLs over time 2,3
    < 0 25 (8.6) 66 (7.7) 0.001
    0 180 (62.1) 641 (74.7)
    1 32 (11.0) 76 (8.9)
    >2 53 (18.3) 75 (8.7)

# of impaired IADLs
    0 204 (64.4) 753 (79.3) <0.001
    1-3 80 (25.2) 146 (15.5)
    4-5 33 (10.4) 50 (5.3)

Type of IADL impairment
    Grocery shopping 91 (30.3) 135 (14.8) <0.001
    Managing money 65 (21.5) 96 (10.5) <0.001
    Cooking 63 (21.7) 102 (11.6) <0.001
    Taking medication 41 (13.1) 47 (5.1) <0.001
    Using the telephone 38 (12.1) 77 (8.2) 0.026

Loss of lADLs over time 2,3
    < 0 13 (4.5) 42 (5.0) <0.001
    0 187 (64.9) 673 (79.3)
    1 35 (12.2) 68 (8.0)
    >2 53 (18.4) 66 (7.8)
1

Data presented as (mean ± S.E.) for continuous variables, n (%) for categorical variables

2

< 0 indicates gain in ADLs (functional improvement); >0 indicates loss of ADLs (functional decline)

3

Median = 2.1 years (time between pre-index date survey and post-index date survey).

Cirrhosis cases: n=290, Comparison group: n=858