Table 1.
Accuracy (% agreement) for Consensus Visual Scoring (left leg)
| Feature Name (Number)a | Accuracyb | TPc | TNd |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative High Frequency Power (1) | 63.530 | 13.849 | 66.917 |
| Spectral Edge Frequency 95th Percentile (2) | 91.838 | 95.723 | 91.573 |
| Skewness (3) | 89.862 | 68.839 | 91.295 |
| Variance (4) | 90.265 | 97.352 | 89.782 |
| Kurtosis (5) | 88.316 | 83.707 | 88.629 |
| Entropy (6) | 45.646 | 50.917 | 45.287 |
| Mobility (7) | 89.537 | 45.214 | 92.559 |
| Amplitude 75th Percentile (8) | 96.829 | 91.853 | 97.168 |
| Complexity (9) | 91.786 | 20.774 | 96.626 |
| Mean Absolute Amplitude (10) | 92.228 | 96.945 | 91.906 |
| Curve Length (11) | 92.488 | 97.759 | 92.128 |
| Energy (12) | 90.265 | 97.352 | 89.782 |
| Zero Crossing (13) | 73.447 | 56.823 | 74.580 |
| Non-Linear Energy (14) | 92.995 | 97.556 | 92.684 |
| Spectral Entropy (15) | 94.957 | 86.354 | 95.544 |
Relevant formulae are shown in parentheses (see text)
Accuracy = % of correct phasic and non-phasic GMM predictions compared to consensus visual scoring
TP = true positives (% of seconds with phasic activity assessed visually that were correctly classified by the GMM for that feature)
TN = true negatives (% of seconds without phasic activity assessed visually that were correctly classified by the GMM for that feature).