Table 4. Pearson’s correlation matrix of the fruit sensorial and nutritional parameters for type of crossing evaluated on clonal populations of selected seedling.
BC1 populations | SS content | TA | Firmness | Chroma | L* | TAC | TPH | |
SS content | – | |||||||
TA | −0.24** | – | ||||||
Firmness | 0.03 | −0.50$ | – | |||||
Chroma | 0.03 | −0.08 | 0.05 | – | ||||
L* | 0.16 | −0.11 | −0.04 | 0.83$ | – | |||
TAC | 0.02 | 0.06 | −0.34$ | −0.29$ | −0.14 | – | ||
TPH | 0.06 | −0.12 | −0.15 | −0.10 | −0.07 | 0.46$ | – | |
ACY | 0.26** | −0.30** | −0.07 | −0.46$ | −0.47$ | 0.33$ | 0.18 | |
BC2 populations | SS content | – | ||||||
TA | 0.18 | – | ||||||
Firmness | −0.22* | −0.24* | – | |||||
Chroma | −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.09 | – | ||||
L* | 0.04 | 0.06 | −0.26* | 0.82$ | – | |||
TAC | 0.29** | 0.45$ | −0.21* | 0.15 | 0.20* | – | ||
TPH | 0.29** | 0.44$ | −0.17 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.47$ | – | |
ACY | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.24* | −0.62$ | −0.65$ | 0.04 | 0.07 | |
Intra-species cross populations | SS | – | ||||||
TA | −0.16 | – | ||||||
Firmness | −0.06 | −0.19 | – | |||||
Chroma | 0.21 | 0.28* | −0.48$ | – | ||||
L* | 0.26* | 0.12 | −0.44$ | 0.75$ | – | |||
TAC | 0.03 | 0.27* | −0.05 | 0.07 | 0.15 | – | ||
TPH | 0.02 | 0.34** | −0.10 | 0.23* | 0.30** | 0.83$ | – | |
ACY | −0.08 | −0.22* | 0.28* | −0.64$ | −0.53$ | 0.37$ | 0.18 |
, **, $ correlation levels significant at p≤0.05; p≤0.01; p≤0.001 respectively.