Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 3;7(10):e46465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046465

Table 2. Filial generation status of wolf-dog hybrids from Estonia and Latvia, estimated with Structure v2.2 under different combinations of ‘Usepopinfo’ parameter settings.

Parameter set A (‘Usepopinfo’ = 0 for all individuals) Parameter set B (‘Usepopinfo’ = 1 for wolves and dogs, 0 for Estonian-Latvian hybrids Filial generation status for hybrids
Sample
Membership coefficient (q) for hybrids to belong to wolf cluster
EHy1 0.77 (0.46–1.00) 0.56 (0.38–0.73) F1or F2?
EHy2 0.61 (0.32–0.89) 0.51 (0.34–0.69) F1or F2?
EHy3 0.70 (0.40–0.99) 0.54 (0.36–0.72) F1or F2?
EHy4 0.67 (0.38–0.95) 0.54 (0.36–0.71) F1or F2?
EHy5 0.74 (0.47–1.00) 0.57 (0.39–0.74) F1or F2?
EHy6 0.62 (0.33–0.89) 0.51 (0.33–0.69) F1or F2?
LHy1 0.53 (0.26–0.79) 0.49 (0.38–0.73) F1
LHy2 0.47 (0.22–0.74) 0.48 (0.31–0.65) F1

Parameter set – two different ‘Usepopoinfo’ parameter sets (A, B) applied to the same data (n = 103). 0 – ‘Usepopinfo’ set to 0; 1 - ‘Usepopinfo’ set to 1; Ehy – hybrids from Estonia (n = 6); Lhy – hybrids from Latvia (n = 2). The q values (membership coefficient) indicate the probability of individual genotypes to belong to wolf cluster (in parentehesis 90% credible regions).