Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 1;2(10):1145–1159. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.003459

Table 2. Pearson correlations between leaf and stem within each experiment.

Chr Experiment r
Chr 5 09FD_120 Loc1 ns
09FD_120 Loc2 ns
10FD-early_83 Loc1 ns
10FD-early_83 Loc2 ns
10FD-late_83 Loc1 0.40 **
10FD-late_83 Loc2 ns
GC_120 p7629 0.62 ***
GC_120 p10353 0.76 ***
GC_120 Sal10 0.75 ***
Chr 11 09FD_120 Loc1&2 ns
10FD-early_83 Loc1 ns
10FD-early_83 Loc2 ns
10FD-late_83 Loc1 0.57 ***
10FD-late_83 Loc2 0.49 ***
GC_120 p7629 0.63 ***
GC_120 p10353 0.73 ***
GC-1_120 Sal10 0.76 ***
GC-2_120 Sal10 0.69 ***
GC-3_120 Sal10 0.67 ***

Correlations (r) were performed by genotype means. Experiment names are given according to the dataset and the Location or Isolate (see Materials and Methods for details). ns = not significant. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.