Table 2. Comparison of the estimated β(TBV, EBV) using BayesB and POCRE.
| Generation |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | 1001/1002 | 1003 | 1004 | 1005 | 1006 | 1007 |
| BayesB | 0.99999 | 1.00015 | 0.99998 | 1.00015 | 0.99999 | 1.00010 |
| POCRE(CV0) | 0.99997 | 1.00020 | 1.00000 | 1.00020 | 0.99996 | 1.00010 |
| POCRE(CV1) | 0.99997 | 1.00020 | 0.99997 | 1.00020 | 0.99994 | 1.00020 |
| POCRE(CV2) | 0.99997 | 1.00020 | 0.99998 | 1.00020 | 0.99995 | 1.00010 |
| POCRE0(CV0) | 0.99996 | 1.00020 | 0.99992 | 1.00020 | 0.99994 | 1.00015 |
| POCRE0(CV1) | 0.99997 | 1.00010 | 0.99996 | 1.00015 | 0.99995 | 1.00010 |
| POCRE0(CV2) | 0.99997 | 1.00020 | 0.99996 | 1.00015 | 0.99994 | 1.00020 |
Total of 50 simulated datasets.