Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 1;2(10):1243–1256. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.004002

Figure 6 .

Figure 6 

(A) Occurrences of the ETS⇔CRE 11-mer CGGAAGTGACG and all 1-bp variants in housekeeping DHS vs. enrichment in housekeeping DHS compared with the genome. (B) Histogram showing abundance of the ETS⇔CRE 11-mer CGGAAGTGACG and 1-bp variants in housekeeping DHS. (C) Table showing occurrences of 1-bp variances of the ETS⇔CRE 11-mer CGGAAGTGACG in the genome and housekeeping DHS. The numbers highlighted in yellow are the consensus ETS⇔CRE 11-mer. (D) Graphical presentation of the 1-bp variants of ETS⇔CRE 11-mer in housekeeping DHS. (E) Molecular model of the ETS⇔CRE motif with the nucleotides in color to highlight which parts of the structure are conserved and variable.