Skip to main content
. 2012 May 4;13:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-78

Table 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of evolved SCFGs and other prediction methods

Grammar KH99 GG1 GG2 GG3 GG4 GG5 GG6 KH99 UNAfold RNAfold Pfold
Our data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sensitivity
0.496
0.505
0.408
0.413
0.474
0.469
0.526
 
 
 
 
PPV
0.479
0.481
0.551
0.550
0.454
0.467
0.479
 
 
 
 
F–score
0.478
0.441
0.473
0.470
0.461
0.339
0.488
 
 
 
 
DE data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sensitivity
0.465
0.466
0.372
0.379
0.408
0.487
0.465
0.47
0.558
0.558
0.39
PPV
0.406
0.405
0.643
0.646
0.344
0.432
0.376
0.45
0.501
0.495
0.69
F–score 0.480 0.468 0.466 0.472 0.430 0.479 0.451        

The sensitivities, PPVs, and F–scores of grammars GG1–GG6 and KH99 on the evaluation set and on the on the [14] data, as well as the benchmarked sensitivities and PPVs of UNAfoldv3.8 and RNAfoldv1.85 on the [14] data. Results for KH99 and Pfold are taken from [14].