Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-96

Table 1.

Summary of cohort studies included in the review

Characteristics Number of studies (N = 82) (%)
Publication year
2000
2
(2)
2001
4
(5)
2002
4
(5)
2003
5
(6)
2004
6
(7)
2005
8
(10)
2006
11
(13)
2007
13
(16)
2008
13
(16)
2009
16
(20)
Number of participants recruited at baseline
Not stated in paper
4
(5)
1,000–2,000
15
(18)
2,000–3,000
13
(16)
3,000–5,000
14
(17)
5,000–10,000
13
(16)
10,000–20,000
14
(17)
20,000 +
9
(11)
Date of baseline recruitment (decade recruitment started)
Not stated in paper
5
(6)
Before 1970
9
(11)
1970–1979
9
(11)
1980–1989
25
(30)
1990–1999
30
(37)
2000–2009
4
(5)
Number of follow-up waves used in the analysis
Number not stated
12
(15)
Mean or range given
7
(9)
1
10
(12)
2
9
(11)
3
18
(22)
4
12
(15)
≥5
14
(17)
Statistical methods for epidemiological analysis†
Cox proportional hazards regression^
37‡
 
  Time-varying covariates
35
 
  Time-invariant covariates
3
 
Generalised Estimating Equations
12*
 
  Linear regression
3
 
  Logistic regression
10
 
Generalised linear mixed-effects modelling
16
 
  Linear regression
13
 
  Logistic regression
3
 
Standard linear regression
3
 
Standard logistic regression
9
 
Other methods 6  

† The total number of papers is 83 because one paper used two analysis models: a Cox proportional hazards model for a time to event outcome and a linear mixed effects model for a numerical outcome.

^ Note one paper used a parametric survival model.

‡ One paper incorporated their repeated measures of exposures using both a time varying covariate and time-invariant covariates.

*One paper had a numerical and binary outcome.