Table 4.
Variables |
Simple logistic regression |
Multiple logistic regression |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P-value | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P-value | |
Age (Younger <30 years) |
0.91 |
0.68–1.22 |
0.526 |
- |
- |
- |
Marital status (Divorced) |
0.47 |
0.29–0.76 |
0.001 |
0.64 |
0.38–1.07 |
0.091 |
Education (None) |
0.86 |
0.58–1.28 |
0.468 |
- |
- |
- |
Employment (None) |
1.22 |
0.91–1.62 |
0.179 |
- |
- |
- |
Residence (Rural) |
2.17 |
1.71–2.75 |
<0.001 |
1.97 |
1.12–3.44 |
0.018 |
Medical aid (Yes) |
4.30 |
1.74–10.63 |
0.002 |
6.15 |
2.31–16.33 |
<0.001 |
Disability Grant (Yes) |
1.54 |
1.22–1.95 |
<0.001 |
1.35 |
1.02–1.78 |
0.037 |
Socioeconomic status (Poor) |
1.50 |
1.17–1.90 |
0.001 |
- |
- |
- |
Borrowing (yes) |
3.84 |
2.86–5.14 |
<0.001 |
2.68 |
1.87–3.84 |
<0.001 |
Difficulty incurring costs (yes) |
1.49 |
1.11–2.01 |
0.008 |
- |
- |
- |
Sell Property for health care (Yes) |
5.08 |
2.40–10.72 |
<0.001 |
2.26 |
0.99–5.20 |
0.054 |
Closest ART facility (Yes) |
1.49 |
1.05–2.10 |
0.025 |
- |
- |
- |
Collection of ART (Monthly) |
2.13 |
1.53–2.96 |
<0.001 |
- |
- |
- |
Treatment supporter (Yes) |
2.05 |
1.57–2.67 |
<0.001 |
1.44 |
1.06–1.97 |
0.021 |
Home visit by health worker (Yes) |
1.31 |
1.02–1.68 |
0.032 |
1.38 |
0.99–1.94 |
0.061 |
Provider preference (Nurse) |
1.42 |
1.11–1.83 |
0.006 |
- |
- |
- |
Ever left without help (Yes) |
1.95 |
1.14–3.32 |
0.014 |
- |
- |
- |
Queue (Too long) |
0.80 |
0.63–1.02 |
0.073 |
- |
- |
- |
Privacy in consultation (No) |
1.54 |
1.19–1.98 |
0.001 |
1.50 |
1.08–2.08 |
0.015 |
Language barrier (Yes) |
0.35 |
0.23–0.53 |
<0.001 |
0.57 |
0.35–0.91 |
0.019 |
Staff disrespect (Agree) |
2.46 |
1.94–3.13 |
<0.001 |
2.07 |
1.54–2.79 |
<0.001 |
Dirty facilities (Agree) |
1.09 |
0.81–1.47 |
0.558 |
- |
- |
- |
ART missed doses (Ever) |
1.51 |
1.06–2.17 |
0.024 |
- |
- |
- |
ART knowledge (Low) |
1.21 |
0.94–1.54 |
0.133 |
- |
- |
- |
Missed clinic visit (Yes) | 1.00 | 0.60–1.68 | 0.999 | - | - | - |
Log Likelihood −656, Pseudo R2 15%, Goodness-of-fit p-value 0.25.