Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Aug 27;54(11):1044–1049. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04401.x

Table II.

Group values for gait spatiotemporal and kinematic variables for non-functional electrical stimulation (FES) and FES conditions

Self-selected walking Month 3 Month 4 Month 7
Walking speed Non-FES 0.30 (0.04) 0.31 (0.03) 0.31 (0.03)a
FES 0.30 (0.03)b 0.32 (0.03) 0.31 (0.03)a
Mean difference 0.00 0.00 0.00
(95% CI) (−0.02 to 0.01)b (0.00 to 0.01) (−0.01 to 0.01)a
Cadence (steps/min) Non-FES 115.8 (9.8) 117.0 (8.4) 115.7 (8.4)a
FES 117.2 (7.7)b 118.3 (8.7) 113.5 (7.3)a
Mean difference 0.6 1.2 −2.1
(95% CI) (−2.7 to 4.0)b (−0.7 to 3.2) (−4.7 to 0.4)a
Step length Non-FES 0.40 (0.04) 0.41 (0.03) 0.41 (0.04)a
FES 0.41 (0.05)b 0.42 (0.04) 0.42 (0.04)a
Mean difference 0.00 0.00 0.01
(95% CI) (−0.01 to 0.01) (0.00 to 0.01) (−0.01 to 0.02)a
c Ankle angle at initial contact (°, p=0.017) Non-FES −4.6 (3.7) −6.7 (3.6) −5.9 (4.4)a
FES −3.7 (3.2)b −4.3 (3.6) −1.9 (5.3)a
Mean difference 0.4 2.4 4.0
(95% CI) (−1.5 to 2.2)b (1.2–3.6) (1.6–6.4)a
c Peak DF angle in swing (°, p=0.015) Non-FES 0.7 (3.8) −1.6 (3.9) −0.3 (4.8)a
FES 2.9 (4.9)b 1.1 (3.4) 3.5 (5.3)a
Mean difference 1.5 2.6 3.8
(95% CI) (0.0–3.0)b (1.6–3.7) (1.4–6.1)a
c Mean DF angle in swing (°, p=0.011) Non-FES −4.5 (5.0) −7.5 (5.6) −5.7 (6.2)a
FES −2.4 (5.7)b −4.3 (4.5) −2.0 (5.7)a
Mean difference 1.8 3.2 3.7
(95% CI) (−0.4 to 4.0)b (2.1–4.4) (1.7–5.6)a
c Ankle angle at toe-off (°, p=0.033) Non-FES −5.0 (5.1) −7.4 (5.5) −5.4 (4.9)a
FES −2.5 (4.7)b −4.7 (3.8) −3.2 (5.3)a
Mean difference 1.4 2.7 2.1
(95% CI) (−0.1 to 2.9)b (1.2–4.2) (0.3–4.0)a

Fast walking
Walking speed Non-FES 0.42 (0.05) 0.42 (0.05) 0.44 (0.07)a
FES 0.41 (0.04)b 0.43 (0.05) 0.44 (0.07)a
Mean difference 0.00 0.00 0.00
(95% CI) (−0.02 to 0.01)b (−0.01 to 0.02) (−0.01 to 0.01)a
Cadence (steps/min) Non-FES 140.0 (18.7) 141.5 (17.3) 142.5 (21.4)a
FES 140.1 (15.1)b 142.0 (17.1) 142.5 (21.7)a
Mean difference 2.9 0.5 0.0
(95% CI) (−1.7 to 7.4)b (−4.0 to 4.9) (−3.5 to 3.6)a
Step length Non-FES 0.46 (0.04) 0.46 (0.04) 0.46 (0.05)a
FES 0.46 (0.04)b 0.46 (0.04) 0.47 (0.05)a
Mean difference −0.01 0.00 0.01
(95% CI) (−0.03 to 0.00)b (−0.01 to 0.01) (−0.01 to 0.02)a
c Ankle angle at initial contact (°, p=0.032) Non-FES −5.0 (3.3) −6.1 (3.1) −6.0 (4.2)a
FES −3.9 (3.4)b −4.6 (3.7) −3.9 (5.3)a
Mean difference 0.8 1.5 2.1
(95% CI) (−1.0 to 2.5)b (0.3–2.8) (0.4–3.8)a
c Peak DF angle in swing (°, p=0.015) Non-FES 0.3 (4.2) −1.1 (3.7) −0.8 (5.2)a
FES 1.9 (5.3)b 0.8 (4.1) 3.1 (5.1)a
Mean difference 1.0 2.0 3.9
(95% CI) (−0.8 to 2.8)b (1.0–2.9) (2.1–5.7)a
c Mean DF angle in swing (°, p=0.014) Non-FES −5.8 (5.2) −7.3 (5.6) −6.3 (6.0)a
FES −4.2 (6.0)b −4.9 (5.3) −2.1 (5.7)a
Mean difference 1.4 2.4 4.2
(95% CI) (−0.7 to 3.5)b (1.5–3.3) (2.4–6.1)a
c Ankle angle at toe-off (°, p=0.038) Non-FES −9.2 (6.2) −10.9 (6.2) −10.1 (7.0)a
FES −7.0 (6.3)b −8.5 (6.2) −6.1 (8.1)a
Mean difference 1.5 2.4 4.0
(95% CI) (−0.4 to 3.3)b (1.2–3.6) (2.0–6.0)a

Values are means (SD). Walking speed and step length are dimensionless values, normalized to subject height. Unless otherwise indicated, the full data set is represented (n=19);

a

n=16;

b

n=13.

c

Significant differences (p<0.05) between non-FES and FES conditions. DF, dorsiflexion.