Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Res Nurs. 2012 Apr 28;15(3):338–346. doi: 10.1177/1099800411434151

Table 3.

Mean Skin Elasticity (SE) and Viscoelasticity (SVE) Ratios by Anatomical Location and Age in 233 Healthy Female Volunteers (Everett et al., 2011)

Site, SVE Ratio, and Age (In Years) N M SD
Forearm R5
 18–30 134 1.05 .15
 31–50 83 1.03 .17
 51–65 16 .84 .17
 All 233 1.03 .17
Forearm R7
 18–30 134 .67 .07
 31–50 83 .63 .08
 51–65 16 .54 .12
 All 233 .65 .09
Upper arm R5
 18–30 134 1.01 .16
 31–50 83 .96 .19
 51–65 16 .88 .13
 All 233 .99 .17
Upper arm R7
 18–30 134 .68 .07
 31–50 83 .64 .09
 51–65 16 .60 .08
 All 233 .66 .08
Upper inner thigh R5
 18–30 134 1.04 .16
 31–50 83 1.01 .19
 51–65 16 1.00 .20
 All 233 1.02 .17
Upper inner thigh R7
 18–30 134 .74 .08
 31–50 83 .69 .10
 51–65 16 .64 .09
 All 233 .71 .09
Sacrum R5
 18–30 134 1.09 .24
 31–50 83 1.15 .33
 51–65 16 1.12 .21
 All 233 1.11 .27
Sacrum R7
 18–30 134 .66 .11
 31–50 83 .64 .13
 51–65 16 .60 .10
 All 233 .65 .12

Note. R5 = net elasticity (SE), R7 = biological elasticity (SVE). Higher mean values indicate greater SE or SVE.