Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Menopause. 2012 Nov;19(11):1176–1185. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31825540d8

Table 2.

Covariate-adjusted linear regression analyses assessing age by depression effects on AFC decline across women.

Linear Regression Ba 95% CI for Ba Beta p R2
Model 1 .268

Main Effects: Age −.861 (−0.973 – −0.749) −.499 <.001
CESD (Total) .047 (−0.028 – 0.123) .041 .22
2-Way Interaction: Age-X-CESD (Total) −.006 (−0.019 – 0.006) −.032 .33

Model 2 .269

Main Effects: Age −.859 (−0.971 – −0.747) −.497 <.001
CESD (Dep Affect) .131 (−0.041 – 0.303) .049 .14
2-Way Interaction: Age-X-CESD (Dep Affect) −.019 (−0.048 – 0.010) −.042 .20

Model 3 .273

Main Effects: Age −.876 (−0.988 – −0.763) −.508 <.001
CESD (Pos Affect) −.124 (−0.371 – 0.123) −.033 .33
2-Way Interaction: Age-X-CESD (Pos Affect) .047 (0.003 – 0.092) .069 .04

Model 4 .265

Main Effects: Age −.867 (−0.980 – −0.754) −.502 <.001
CESD (Somatic) .033 (−0.171 – 0.237) .011 .75
2-Way Interaction: Age-X-CESD (Somatic) .013 (−0.022 – 0.049) .024 .46

Model 5 .271

Main Effects: Age −.865 (−0.979 – −0.752) −.501 <.001
CESD (Interpersonal) .552 (−0.068 – 1.171) .059 .08
2-Way Interaction: Age-X-CESD (Interpersonal) −.040 (−0.143 – 0.062) −.025 .44
a

unstandardized regression coefficient