Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 27;66(11):982–989. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200311

Table 6.

Relationships between ecological deprivation indices scores, French EDI and Townsend scores, and individual deprivation criteria, personal income and educational level (N=1248)

N (row %) Personal income Diploma
<€800 (%) ≥€800 (%) Total Without (%) With (%) Total
Quintile 1*
 EDI 52 (23.7) 167 (76.3%) 219 35 (13.5%) 224 (86.5%) 259
 Townsend 43 (25.4) 126 (74.6%) 169 26 (13.8%) 163 (86.2%) 189
Quintile 2
 EDI 62 (31.8) 133 (68.2%) 195 38 (16.4%) 194 (83.6%) 232
 Townsend 35 (27.8) 91 (72.2%) 126 32 (20.5%) 124 (79.5%) 156
Quintile 3
 EDI 66 (37.3) 111 (62.7%) 177 32 (14.9%) 183 (85.1%) 215
 Townsend 56 (37.3) 94 (62.7%) 160 32 (17.6%) 150 (82.4%) 182
Quintile 4
 EDI 76 (33.8) 149 (66.2%) 225 49 (17.0%) 240 (83.0%) 289
 Townsend 79 (35.6) 143 (64.4%) 222 41 (14.2%) 248 (85.8%) 289
Quintile 5
 EDI 64 (35.4) 117 (64.6%) 181 51 (22.9%) 172 (77.1%) 223
 Townsend 107 (32.4) 223 (67.6%) 330 74 (18.4%) 328 (81.6%) 402
Total 320 (32.1) 677 (68.9%) 997 p-trend 205 (16.8%) 1013 (83.2%) 1218§ p-trend
EDI 0.0059 0.0070
Townsend 0.0409 0.2818
*

The least deprived.

The most deprived.

For personal income, 251 data were not actionable (207 refusals to answer, 24 unknown, 20 missing data).

§

For educational level, 30 missing data.

Cochran–Armitage test for trend of ordered variables.

EDI, European Deprivation Index.