Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Dev Psychol. 2012 Jan 16;30(4):569–585. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02073.x

Table 4.

Hierarchical Regression of T1 Prosocial Affiliation and Sex of Child Predicting T2 Negative Emotional Responding in Peer Situations.

Effect Standardized
Coefficient
t
Step 1 (R2 = .06)
   Age −.13 −1.14
   Proportion of Peer Interactions .14 1.23
   Classroom Level Prosociality −.15 −1.41
   T1 Negative Emotionality −.02 −.61
Step 2 (R2 = .54; R2 change =.48****
   Sex (1=boy; 2=girl) −.21 −3.25***
   T1 Prosocial Affiliation Quotient −.78 −10.93****
Step 3 (R2 =.69; R2 change =.05****)
   T1 Prosocial Affiliation Quotient X Sex of Child .26 3.69****

Note.

*

p <.05;

***

p<.005;

****

p<.001.

N=124