Table 4.
Subject | Training set | Test set | 1st | 2st | 3st | MSJAD | FSDE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | A01T | A01E | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.66 | 0.56 |
S2 | A02T | A02E | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.41 |
S3 | A03T | A03E | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.77 | 0.43 |
S4 | A04T | A04E | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.51 | 0.41 |
S5 | A05T | A05E | 0.4 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.5 | 0.68 |
S6 | A06T | A06E | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.48 |
S7 | A07T | A07E | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
S8 | A08T | A08E | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
S9 | A09T | A09E | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.63 |
Mean | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.5 | 0.57 | ||
Std. | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.15 |
Kappa Scores obtained by three best competitions 1st–3st (see text footnote 5), MSJAD (Gouy-Pailler et al., 2010), as well as the method (FSDE) presented in this paper. Best kappa values are highlighted in bold.