Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2012 Sep 24;63(16):6017–6021. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers254

Time-lapse imaging of the initiation of pollen embryogenesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

D S Daghma 1,2, J Kumlehn 1, G Hensel 1, T Rutten 1, M Melzer 1,*
PMCID: PMC3467303  PMID: 22991158

Abstract

Pollen embryogenesis provides exciting opportunities in the areas of breeding and biotechnology as well as representing a convenient model for studying the process of plant cell proliferation in general and embryogenesis in particular. A cell culture system was devised in which immature barley pollen could be cultured as a monolayer trapped between the bottom glass-cover slip of a live-cell chamber and a diaphanous PTFE membrane within a liquid medium over a period of up to 28 d, allowing the process of embryogenesis to be tracked in individual pollen. Z-stacks of images were automatically captured every 3min, starting from the unicellular pollen stage up to the development of multicellular, embryogenic structures. The method should prove useful for the elucidation of ultrastructural features and molecular processes associated with pollen embryogenesis.

Key words: Barley, chamber cover slip, live-cell microscopy, pollen embryogenesis

Introduction

The normal development of the male gametophyte of some plant species can be redirected into embryogenic development, resulting in the formation of embryos able to differentiate into haploid plants (Reynolds, 1997). Pollen embryogenesis is of importance in the breeding of certain crop species as it simplifies the fixation of meiotic recombination events via the doubling of the chromosome complement of haploid regenerants. Barley is particularly amenable to pollen embryogenesis, a feature which has helped achieve the crop’s status as the leading model temperate cereal (Maraschin et al., 2005a). Defining reliable structural markers for pollen embryogenesis, which has proved to be difficult to date (Pechan and Smykal, 2001), requires the in vivo microscopy of cultured immature pollen (Krens et al., 1998). Previous efforts to track the fate of individual pollen (Bolik and Koop, 1991; Kumlehn and Lörz, 1999; Indrianto et al., 2001; Maraschin et al., 2005b , 2008) suffered from the inadequate delivery of signalling molecules produced by co-cultivated embryogenic pollen, a process which is inevitably compromised when the target pollen grains have to be immobilized in a gel matrix. Signalling has been shown to be essential for the definition of cell identity and proliferation in plant cell cultures (Kumlehn and Lörz, 1999; Kumlehn et al., 1999). In addition, these experiments have had to rely on the acquisition of a series of images, in which the time-interval between their capture has been of the order of several hours; such a long separation can be expected to fail to record a number of important cellular events.

A method whereby immature barley pollen, arranged in a monolayer within a liquid medium, develops normally and its growth can be followed over a period of several weeks is demonstrated here. The automated capture of Z-stacks of images allowed for an unprecedented level of temporal resolution to be achieved. The method should prove valuable for elucidating the ultrastructural features and the molecular machinery important for the initiation of pollen embryogenesis and other cellular processes occurring in developing pollen.

Materials and methods

Plant material and the induction of pollen embryogenesis

The protocol described by Coronado et al. (2005) was applied to raise barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. ‘Igri’ (Saatzucht Ackermann, Irlbach, Germany) plants as a source of immature pollen amenable to pollen embryogenesis.

Construction and use of a live-cell chamber cover slip

All procedures were performed under aseptic conditions. Construction of a live-cell chamber was based on a two-well chambered coverglass (Thermo Scientific-Cat. No. 155380) in combination with an 0.4 µm hydrophilic, diaphanous PTFE membrane of a 12mm Millicell Cell Culture Insert (Millipore-Cat. No. PICM01250) (hereafter referred to as a ‘PTFE membrane’) and a plastic mask fabricated from a Countess® Cell Counting Chamber Slide (Invitrogen, Cat. No. C10315) (Fig. 1). The PTFE membranes were removed (Fig. 1B, 1C), and the plastic masks (Fig. 1E) adjusted in size to fit precisely within the well of the chambered coverglass (Fig. 1G). A square hole of size approximately 7×7mm was cut in its centre using a heated scalpel blade (Fig. 1E). One of the PTFE membranes was then placed over the square hole and, using a pair of heated forceps, the edge of the membrane was fused to the plastic mask (Fig. 1F). A second plastic mask was prepared in the same way.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Components of the live-cell chamber cover slip. (A) The two-well chambered coverglass. (B) A 12mm Millicell Cell Culture Insert with its 0.4 µm hydrophilic PTFE membrane. (C) A PTFE membrane in the process of being detached by forceps. (D) A Countess® Cell Counting Chamber Slide with two plastic masks. (E) Punctured plastic mask. (F) Plastic mask with hole covered by PTFE membrane. (G) Plastic mask placed inside the chambered coverglass. (H) A pipette tip sealed with a 30 µm nylon mesh.

A suspension of ca. 200 000ml–1 immature barley pollen was concentrated 10-fold by removing 900 µl of medium from a 1ml volume using a 30 µm mesh-coated 1ml pipette tip (Fig. 1H). Approximately 100 µl concentrated cell suspension was pipetted onto the lid of a plastic Petri dish (Fig. 2C), which ensured that the droplet took on a convex shape. The droplet was left undisturbed for 3–5min to allow dead cells and detritus to precipitate while the viable cells accumulate at the surface of the droplet. Then, a PTFE membrane was brought into contact with the droplet for 2–3 s, allowing a thin layer of medium containing viable cells to adhere. The membrane was blotted gently with a filter paper to remove as much of the culture medium as possible, and was then placed face down in the well of the chambered coverglass (Fig. 2D), avoiding the formation of air bubbles between the membrane and the cover slip. This created a monolayer of immature pollen cells in direct contact with the cover slip (Fig. 2D, 2J). Subsequently, the PTFE membrane was covered with ca. 50 µl of starvation medium (SMB1) (Coronado et al., 2005) semi-solidified by the addition of 6mg ml–1 agarose (type I, low EEO; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) (Fig. 2E). After a second plastic mask was placed above the agarose layer (Fig. 2F, 2G), 1ml of embryogenic pollen culture was pipetted into the chamber to ensure a sufficient supply of signalling molecules for the test pollen (Fig. 2I). The combination of agarose and the second mask ensured that the optical focal plane was free of contamination from the feeder cells (Fig. 2J). In order to avoid interference from condensation on the inner surface of the chamber lid, a smooth edged 15×15mm gap was cut into the lid of the chamber and covered with a sterile cover slip, which was replaced every day (Fig. 2H). The gap also facilitated the exchange of medium to compensate for evaporation. The set-up ensured that the test pollen remained immersed in liquid culture medium, thereby providing suitable culture conditions. After 2 d, the starvation medium was withdrawn using a 30 µm mesh-coated 1ml pipette tip (Fig. 1H), and replaced by 1ml KBP nutrient medium (Coronado et al., 2005). This step had to be done with care to avoid mechanical disturbance of the test pollen.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Schematic illustrations of the home-made live-cell chamber cover slip used for time-lapse recording of pollen embryogenesis. (A) Cultured immature pollen in a 3.5mm Petri dish. (B) A detached 0.4 µm hydrophilic, diaphanous PTFE membrane. (C) A droplet of highly concentrated pollen suspension on the hydrophobic lid of a plastic Petri dish. (D) A monolayer of pollen adhering to a PTFE membrane positioned, along with a plastic mask, within a chamber coverglass. (E) Covering the PTFE membrane with SMB1 medium semi-solidified with agarose. (F) The plastic mask with the PTFE membrane. (G) The plastic mask being placed over the agarose layer. (H) The live-cell chamber being covered by a lid. (I) The addition of 1ml pollen suspension and the covering of the hole with a cover slip; the live-cell chamber slide is now ready for monitoring. (J) The pollen monolayer is sandwiched between the bottom slide of the live-cell chamber and a PTFE membrane. IP, immature pollen.

In a series of preliminary trials, in which non-immobilized cultured pollen were used as a control, it was established that neither 5min nor 3min interval recordings had any detrimental effect on pollen vitality and development. Reducing the time interval to only 2min, however, caused the cultures to die between 3–5 d after the start of the recordings. Therefore the 3min time-interval was selected as the standard to perform live-cell imaging of pollen embryogenesis. Z-stacks of nine images with a total scanning time of 40 s were acquired every 3min. Pollen development was monitored for a period of up to 28 d using a HeNe 633nm laser line. The optical interval of the Z-stacks was gradually increased from 2 µm to 4 µm over the course of the monitoring period to take account of the expansion of the test pollen. In vivo microscopy was performed using a Zeiss LSM 510 META (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with a ×20 objective (NA 0.75). The microscope was installed in a dark room kept at a constant 25 °C to avoid focus drift. From every individual Z-stack a single 2D image was selected. Finally, 5069 images were used to compile a time-lapse movie depicting the course of pollen development (see Supplementary Video S1 at JXB online).

Results

The movie shown here is representative of a total of eight individual trials lasting between 14 d and 28 d that were performed to prove the usefulness of the system (see Supplementary Video S1 at JXB online). Every trial comprised between 4 and 15 observed pollen and showed similar patterns of pollen development and similar pollen types were identified. Without the possibility of agitating the culture medium, the rate of development was significantly delayed to the extent that it took as long as 28 d for embryogenic microcalli to emerge from the exine. In conventionally grown embryogenic pollen, exine breakage typically occurs in the third week of cultivation. Nevertheless, the cultures appeared to retain a high level of viability which was not compromised by the recordings. Tracking of four pre-mitotic pollen over the course of 28 d resulted in a set of 91 242 images. The first mitotic division occurred in pollen #1 after 2 d (Fig. 3A). The nuclear division took place at the cell periphery opposite the pollen aperture and produced two equal-sized nuclei. Over the course of the following days, a synchronized series of mitotic divisions occurred, generating a multicellular structure (Fig. 3E–I). Despite this mitotic activity, the dimensions of this pollen remained constant over the first 14 d (Fig. 3C–H), but expanded considerably thereafter. In pollen #2, the first pollen mitosis occurred after 3 d (Fig. 3B), following this the large vacuole remained for approximately 10 d (Fig. 3C, 3D). Thereafter, the pair of nuclei migrated towards the centre, so that the cytoplasm assumed a star-like pattern. Finally, the volume of the vacuole gradually diminished (Fig. 3E, 3F). No further mitoses were observed, and this pollen retained a constant size over the entire period of observation. Starting at day 15, detectable starch granules began to accumulate within the cells (Fig. 3H, 3I). Pollen #3 did not develop at all and collapsed on day seven (Fig. 3F). Pollen #4 initially swelled (Fig. 3A–E) before the first pollen mitosis took place at the cell periphery on day seven, resulting in the generation of a pair of similar-sized nuclei (Fig. 3F). Several further synchronized series of mitoses subsequently converted this pollen grain into an expanding multicellular structure (Fig. 3G–I). None of the four test pollen described above had its exine ruptured by day 28, although rupture was observed in some pollen grains of other trials that were run under the same conditions. For comparison, conventionally cultured embryogenic pollen (non-immobilized, incubated in 35mm Petri dishes) was analysed at representative time points after induction of pollen embryogenesis. The results revealed that there are no significant differences between non-immobilized and immobilized pollen with respect to viability, developmental pattern, and ratio of identified cell types (dead pollen, starch accumulated pollen, multicellular structures).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Representative example of in vivo microscopy of cultured immature pollen over a 28 d period. (A–I) Individual pollen #1 and #4 underwent pollen embryogenesis and generated a multicellular structure. (E, F) After just one mitotic division, development was arrested in pollen #2, and starch granules began to accumulate. (F–I) Pollen #3 did not show any sign of development and died after 7 d. N, nucleus. Bar=10 µm.

The entire series of images from which those shown in Fig. 3 have been selected is available online in the form of a time-lapse video (see Supplementary Video S1 at JXB online).

Discussion

The experimental set-up described here provided appropriate growing conditions while simultaneously permitting high-quality imaging of cellular events. It also allowed for the culture medium to be completely exchanged, which was not possible in previous attempts to perform time-lapse imaging where the targets were immobilized within a solidified medium (Kumlehn and Lörz, 1999; Indrianto et al., 2001; Maraschin et al., 2005b ) and were thus subject to sub-optimal conditions since they had limited access to the signalling molecules produced by freely growing feeder cells. The presence of the PTFE membrane ensured that the test pollen were trapped within the liquid medium, while at the same time allowing for the free flow of nutrients and signalling molecules. Since the test pollen were in close contact to the cover slip of the chamber coverglass, it was possible to use high numerical aperture objectives to acquire high quality images.

It has been shown previously that well-spaced cells undergoing pollen embryogenesis can be successfully observed by light microscopy, since spacing avoids the problems of cell overgrowth and optical interference from non-target cells (Kumlehn and Lörz, 1999; Indrianto et al., 2001). However, successful embryogenesis does require a certain cell density. This requirement was satisfied by separating the monolayer of observed pollen from a highly concentrated (200 000 pollen ml–1) feeder population, using a thin layer of solidified medium sandwiched between two permeable PTFE membranes. Previous observations of the in vitro development of wheat (Indrianto et al., 2001) and barley (Bolik and Koop, 1991; Kumlehn and Lörz, 1999; Maraschin et al., 2005a, b, 2008) embryogenic pollen invariably used time-intervals of one to several hours. Although this level of temporal resolution may be sufficient to identify major events, such long time-intervals are not well suited for the documentation of the full detail of events associated with pollen embryogenesis. The temporal resolution was increased here to 3min and our set-up has proved to be able to maintain the test pollen in a viable state for at least 28 d.

Cultured immature pollen characteristically develops at a variable rate, as illustrated by the differential performance of the four individual pollen shown in Fig. 3. Three contrasting fates, as also outlined by Maraschin et al. (2005a, b), were observed: some cells underwent proliferation, and subsequently formed embryogenic microcalli; some were arrested in development after initial rounds of mitosis had occurred; and some failed to develop at all. Indrianto et al. (2001) and Maraschin et al. (2005a, b) reported that, prior to the first mitosis of pollen-embryogenesis-competent pollen of wheat and barley, the nucleus migrates to a central position, leading to the cytoplasm taking on a star-like appearance within the highly vacuolated pollen. This feature has been considered to be a predictive marker for the initiation of pollen embryogenesis. By contrast, in both pollen #1 and #4 (as well as in many other pollen not shown here), the first mitosis took place while the nucleus was still at the cell periphery. A star-like pattern did occur after the first pollen mitosis in pollen #2 (Fig. 3E, 3F), which went on to accumulate starch rather than switch to embryogenic development. In our view, therefore, the formation of the star-like cytoplasm is not a reliable morphological marker for embryogenic pollen development.

The goal of the 28 d study was a test-case to establish the technical limits of our set-up. In a typical experiment, such long running times are not necessary for detailed scientific observations focusing on the initiation of pollen embryogenesis but could be useful to study cell proliferation and embryo formation.

We suggest that the improvement in efficiency and temporal resolution achieved by the cell culture method described here will facilitate a more comprehensive analysis of the key events in pollen embryogenesis, leading potentially to the identification of molecular triggers. In particular, its application to transgenic material expressing fluorophore-labelled cellular structures such as nuclei, chromatin or components of the cytoskeleton will generate a wealth of detailed information concerning the process of pollen embryogenesis.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data can be found at JXB online.

Supplementary Video S1. A time-lapse movie (5069 images, 7 pictures per second) depicting the course of pollen development over 28 d.

References

  1. Bolik M, Koop HU. 1991. Identification of embryogenic pollen of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by individual selection and culture and their potential for transformation by microinjection Protoplasma 162 61–68 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coronado MJ, Hensel G, Broeders S, Otto I, Kumlehn J. 2005. Immature pollen-derived doubled haploid formation in barley cv. Golden Promise as a tool for transgenic recombination Acta Physiologia Plantarum 27 591–599 [Google Scholar]
  3. Indrianto A, Barinova I, Touraev A, Heberle-Bors E. 2001. Tracking individual wheat pollen in vitro: identification of embryogenic pollen and body axis formation in the embryo Planta 212 163–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Krens FA, Verhoeven HA, van Tunen AJ, Hall RD. 1998. The use of an automated cell tracking system to identify specific cell types competent for regeneration and transformation In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology of Plants 34 81–86 [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumlehn J, Lörz H. 1999. Monitoring sporophytic development of indidvidual pollen of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). In: Clement C, Pacini E, Audran J-C, eds. Anther and pollen from biology to biotechnology Berlin, New York: Springer; 183–190 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumlehn J, Lörz H, Kranz E. 1999. Monitoring individual development of isolated wheat zygotes: a novel approach to study early embryogenesis Protoplasma 208 156–162 [Google Scholar]
  7. Maraschin SF, de Priester W, Spaink HP, Wang M. 2005a. Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective Journal of Experimental Botany 56 1711–1726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maraschin SF, Vennik M, Lamers GEM, Spaink HP, Wang M. 2005b. Time-lapse tracking of barley androgenesis reveals position-determined cell death within pro-embryos Planta 220 531–540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maraschin SF, van Bergen S, Vennik M, Wang M. 2008. Plant embryogenesis. In: Suárez MF, Bozhkov PV, eds. Methods in molecular biology Totowa, New Jersey, USA: Humana Press; 77–89 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pechan PM, Smykal P. 2001. Androgenesis: affecting the fate of the male gametophyte Physiologia Plantarum 111 1–8 [Google Scholar]
  11. Reynolds TL. 1997. Pollen embryogenesis Plant Molecular Biology 33 1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES