Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar 17;13(4):301–313. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1

Table 3.

Technical data of the nine condition-specific questionnaires in comparison

ODI RMDQ LBOS QBPDS MVAS ALBDS NASS LSO LBPRS WDI
Floor effect Yes [49] Unknown 0% [27] Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 16.1% [27]
Ceiling effect Unknown Present [59] 4.6% [27] Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 1/0% [27]
Retest Pearson correlation 0.83 [29] 0.91 [55] 0.92 [32] 0.67 [26] 0.92 [46] 0.94 [56] 0.85–0.99 [15] 0.73–0.9
0.78 [26] 0.88 [35]
0.91 [38] 0.83 [17]
Kappa values 0.51–0.86 [32] 0.85–0.97 [15] 0.27–1.0
Bland–Altman plot 11.6 [32] 26.6 [56]
ICC 0.91/0.9 [26] 0.53 [16] 0.92/0.55 [26] 0.74 [16]
0.84 [16] 0.86 [59] 0.84 [16]
0.89 [1] 0.91 [38] 0.92 [38]
Cronbach’s alpha 0.76 [25] 0.89/0.92 [33] 0.85 [32] 0.96 [38] 0.93 [46] 0.8 [56] 0.88 [15] 0.98 [44]
0.81 [38] 0.91 [61]
0.77/93 [33]
Spearman rank analysis 0.59 [60] 0.6 [60]
ROC with an AUC value of 0.76 [4] 0.78/0.74 0.87/0.74 0.76 [16]
0.94 [26] 0.77 [16] 0.74 [16] 0.87 [26]
0.78 [16] 0.93 [38]
Norman–Steiner sensitivity analysis 0.15 [38] 0.2 [38] 0.26 [38]
Standardized response mean 0.36 [59] 0.5 [59] 0.49 [16] 0.35 [16]
0.52 [16] 0.55 [16]
MCID 16 [24] 5.2 [53] 7.5 [32] 14 [38] 2.8 [16]
15 [16] 8.6–9.5 [16] 19 [16]
6 [26] 4 [59] 15 [26]
Compared with RMDQ [23, 25, 45] ODI [16, 33, 42] ODI [27, 63] RMDQ [16, 38] ODI [46, 70] SF36 [56] SF36 [15] ODI [11] RMDQ [16]
QBPDS [16, 26, 38] QBPDS [16, 38] WDI [27] ODI [16, 26, 38] RMDQ [16] QVPDS [16]
WDI [16, 63] WDI [16] SF36 [63] SF36 [16, 38] WDI [16] ODI [16]
LBOS [27] SF36 [16] LBOS [27]
SF36 [16] SF36 [16]
MVAS [70] MVAS [16]
LBPRS [11]