Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 3;44(6):616–626. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2011.583674

Table III.

Number of responses to phone-based diary and observed frequency (%) of hot flushes by intervention month and group. Estimated proportion of hot flushes from multilevel mixed logistic regression.

Intervention group Control group


Month Responses Number of responses with hot flushes Observed proportion of responses with hot flushes (%) Estimated proportion of hot flushes from mixed model Responses Number of responses with hot flushes Observed proportion of responses with hot flushes (%) Estimated proportion of hot flushes from mixed model
Night-time hot flushes:
 1 (base-line) 1513 867 57.3 56.1 1518 920 60.6 59.7
 2 1719 948 55.1 54.3 1712 1018 59.5 58.6
 3 1629 843 51.7 53.2 1576 863 54.8 58.1
 4 1611 795 49.3 52.6 1581 872 55.2 55.6
 5 1552 780 50.3 48.5 1503 866 57.6 54.3
 6 (end) 1314 624 47.5 46.0 1361 716 52.6 54.0
Mixed model for day-time hot flushes:
P (group at base-line) = 0.88.
P (month) = <0.001.
P (group X month) = 0.012.
Day-time hot flushes:
 1 (base-line) 1314 951 72.4 68.2 1339 952 71.1 68.5
 2 1626 1080 66.4 67.1 1640 1151 70.2 69.1
 3 1537 970 63.1 66.5 1542 978 63.4 67.8
 4 1495 964 64.5 67.2 1446 936 64.7 67.3
 5 1386 931 67.2 66.2 1463 1014 69.3 66.6
 6 (end) 1208 840 69.5 66.6 1292 861 66.6 65.7

Mixed model for day-time hot flushes:

P (group at base-line) = 0.18.

P (month) = 0.005.

P (group X month) = 0.61.