Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 6;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-16

Table 1.

Risk factor for lymph node metastasis in patients with submucosal invasive colorectal cancer

 
 
Lymph node involvement
P-value
    No (n = 47) Yes (n = 8) Univariate Multivariate
Age
Mean ± S.D.
60.8 ± 9.7
64.0 ± 8.9
0.381
 
Sex
male
29 (61.7 %)
5 (62.5 %)
 
 
 
female
18 (38.3 %)
3 (37.5 %)
0.966
 
Tumor location
Rt. Sided colon
6 (12.8 %)
2 (25.0 %)
 
 
 
Lt. Sided colon§
22 (46.8 %)
4 (50.0 %)
 
 
 
Rectum
19 (40.4 %)
2 (25.0 %)
0.345
 
Macroscopic shape of
Ip
23 (48.9 %)
3 (37.5 %)
 
 
tumor
Isp
9 (19.1 %)
1 (12.5 %)
 
 
 
Is
12 (25.5 %)
3 (37.5 %)
0.485
 
Tumor size
≤ 2.3 cm
20 (42.6 %)
5 (62.5 %)
 
 
 
> 2.3 cm
19 (40.4 %)
2 (25.0 %)
0.428
 
Circumference ratio
≤ 1/4
26 (55.3 %)
6 (75.0 %)
 
 
 
1/4 < or ≤ 2/4
17 (36.2 %)
2 (25.0 %)
 
 
 
2/4 < or ≤ 3/4
1 (2.1 %)
0
 
 
 
> 3/4
0
0
0.375
 
Depth of invasion (μm)
< 1000
1 (2.1 %)
0
 
 
 
1000 ≤ or < 2000
6 (12.8 %)
2 (25.0 %)
 
 
 
2000 ≤ or < 3000
10 (21.3 %)
0
 
 
 
3000 ≤
23 (48.9 %)
4 (50.0 %)
0.435
0.282
Depth of invasion (by
Sm1
12 (25.5 %)
2 (25.0 %)
 
 
Kudo’s classification)
Sm2
17 (36.2 %)
1 (12.5 %)
 
 
 
Sm3
10 (21.3 %)
3 (37.5 %)
0.364
0.063
Differentiation
well
21 (44.7 %)
1 (12.5 %)
 
 
 
moderately
21 (44.7 %)
6 (75.0 %)
 
 
 
poorly
0
0
0.112
0.856
Lymphovascular
Absent
37 (78.7 %)
4 (50.0 %)
 
 
invasion
Present
5 (10.6 %)
2 (25.5 %)
0.206
0.232
Tumor budding
Absent
23 (48.9 %)
1 (12.5 %)
 
 
 
Present
15 (31.9 %)
5 (75.0 %)
0.047
0.042
Microacinar structure
Absent
29 (61.7 %)
3 (37.5 %)
 
 
  Present 9 (19.1 %) 3 (37.5 %) 0.179 0.247

† = including cecum, ascending, hepatic flexure, and proximal transverse colon.

‡ = including mid to distal transverse, descending, sigmoid, and rectosigmoid colon.

§ = ratio of the circumference of tumor to luminal circumference.