Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Genet. 2012 Aug 7;82(5):408–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01909.x

Table 4.

Proportion of participants who strongly agreed to each genome sequencing knowledge item before and after consent process (N=311).

Knowledge concept Pre-consenta Post-consent p-value
N (%) N (%)
Sequencing limitations
Once a risk-increasing variant is found, the disease cannot always be prevented or cured 163 (53.8%) 191 (67.0%) <.0001
Genome sequencing cannot tell someone their exact disease risk 158 (52.1%) 184 (64.1%) <.0001
Effects of all variants on disease risk are not known 166 (54.6%) 187 (65.2%) <.0001
People with a risk-increasing variant may not develop the disease 166 (54.6%) 186 (65.0%) 0.001
Genome sequencing is not a routine test available from physicians 200 (65.8%) 206 (71.8%) 0.03
Sequencing benefits
Genome sequencing may find variants that people can pass on to their children 253 (83.2%) 247 (85.8%) 0.21
People can learn about risk for several diseases through genome sequencing. 191 (62.8%) 220 (76.9%) <.0001
Genome sequencing may find risk-increasing variants 220 (72.1%) 231 (80.2%) 0.006
Genome sequencing may find risk-decreasing variants 66 (22.0%) 78 (27.6%) 0.02
Genome sequencing may find variants that affect drug response 86 (28.5%) 106 (37.1%) <.0001
Health habits also affect disease risk 79 (26.2%) 85 (30.0%) 0.03
a

Correct answers were defined as “strongly agree” for each item as shown in Appendix A.