Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13597–13607. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1229-12.2012

Table 1.

Effect of cannabinoid modulators on motoneuron resting membrane properties and on the mPSC parameters

Parameter Control (n = 7) AM 251 (n = 7) Control (n = 15) WIN 55,212-2 (n = 17) Control (n = 9) ACEA (n = 6) Control (n = 5) AM 404 (n = 5) Control (n = 8) LY 2183240 (n = 13)
Membrane potential (mV) −63 ± 9.2 −66 ± 8.7 −65 ± 5.4 −71 ± 4.7 −71 ± 5.3 −65 ± 4.2 −59 ± 6.4 −62 ± 7.1 −61 ± 3.5 −60 ± 4.2
Membrane resistance (MΩ) 519 ± 76 487 ± 53 582 ± 56 573 ± 28 576 ± 89 521 ± 49 448 ± 62 472 ± 85 519 ± 38 530 ± 27
AMPA mPSC mean amplitude (pA) 8.4 ± 0.2 8.5 ± 0.5 15.2 ± 1.5 15.6 ± 1.4 16.8 ± 0.4 11.0 ± 0.3 8.8 ± 0.5 9.1 ± 1.5 12.8 ± 0.6 12.9 ± 0.7
AMPA mPSC frequency (Hz) 0.24 ± 0.03 1.03 ± 0.03 0.26 ± 0.08 0.10 ± 0.02 0.88 ± 0.24 0.4 ± 0.08 0.4 ± 0.04 0.11 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.14 0.15 ± 0.05
(n = 7) (n = 7) (n = 8) (n = 8) (n = 4) (n = 4) (n = 5) (n = 5) (n = 5) (n = 5)
AMPA mPSC decay time (ms) 4.8 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.3 4.9 ± 0.7 5.1 ± 0.6 6.7 ± 0.3 7.1 ± 0.4 7.4 ± 1.0 9.3 ± 1.1 5.6 ± 0.3 6.6 ± 0.5
GABA mPSC mean amplitude (pA) 13.3 ± 0.4 12.0 ± 0.6 23.7 ± 2.1 25.3 ± 2 24.4 ± 1.1 14.5 ± 0.5 17.8 ± 1.8 11.5 ± 1.4 n.m. n.m.
GABA mPSC frequency (Hz) 0.57 ± 0.04 0.61 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.1 0.31 ± 0.08 0.57 ± 0.06 0.54 ± 0.07 0.52 ± 0.07 0.35 ± 0.11 n.m. n.m.
GABA mPSC decay time (ms) 26.3 ± 0.8 27.4 ± 1.1 32 ± 4 33.6 ± 2.7 32.8 ± 0.1 35.4 ± 0.1 30.8 ± 1.3 34.7 ± 1.1 n.m. n.m.

Bold numbers indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), n.m. indicates not measured.

Denotes that the value was obtained from the same cells before and during drug addition (number of cells shown in parentheses). Averages are expressed as mean ± SEM Student's t test (α = 0.05) was used to perform the statistical analyses of membrane potential, resistance, mPSC amplitude, frequency, and decay time.