Table 11.
Same comparisons as Table 9 using the RBF classifier, illustrating that the effect of EPP on classification is not classifier-dependent.
| Set | ℒ 3 | SBP(ℒ3) | SP(ℒ3) | ITF1(ℒ3) | ITF2(ℒ3) | ITF3(ℒ3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64.4 | 39.3 | 65.9 |
| CHO | 0 | 0 | 27.2 | 90.3 | 77.1 | 92.0 |
| HeLa | 0 | 0 | 29.2 | 74.2 | 54.2 | 74.4 |
| C.elegans, BWM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36.4 | 32.5 | 38.5 |
| C.elegans, TB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.7 | 19.5 | 33.3 |
| ATT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.1 | 23.6 | 61.6 |
| Yale | 0 | 10.0 | 0 | 69.2 | 56.7 | 70.1 |
| Yale B | 0 | 56.6 | 42.0 | 76.6 | 56.5 | 84.4 |
| Brodatz | 0 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 39.8 | 18.2 | 42.0 |
| Average | 0 | 7.6 | 11.1 | 60.5 | 42.0 | 62.5 |