Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1602–1610. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26404

Table 2.

Cognitive function at each cognitive assessment, by B vitamin treatment

Treatment Assignment
Cognitive Test Folic acid / B6 / B12 Placebo
Cognitive Assessment No. of subjects Mean (SE) * No. of subjects Mean (SE) * Mean difference [B vitamin Group - Placebo Group] (95% CI)
PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Global score
1 1002 0.00 (0.02) 1007 −0.01 (0.02) 0.01 (−0.05, 0.07)
2 911 0.06 (0.03) 923 0.01 (0.02) 0.05 (−0.01, 0.12)
3 850 −0.04 (0.03) 845 −0.07 (0.03) 0.02 (−0.06, 0.10)
4 521 −0.02 (0.03) 532 −0.07 (0.03) 0.05 (−0.04,0.14)
KEY SECONDARY ENDPOINT: Verbal memory score
1 1002 0.00 (0.02) 1007 0.00 (0.02) 0.01 (−0.06, 0.07)
2 911 0.07 (0.03) 923 0.01 (0.03) 0.06 (−0.02, 0.13)
3 850 0.03 (0.03) 845 0.03 (0.03) 0.00 (−0.07, 0.08)
4 521 0.03 (0.03) 532 −0.04 (0.03) 0.06 (−0.03, 0.16)
TICS score
1 1002 34.35 (0.10) 1007 34.38 (0.10) −0.04 (−0.31, 0.24)
2 911 34.39 (0.11) 923 34.30 (0.10) 0.09 (−0.21, 0.39)
3 850 34.05 (0.11) 845 33.94 (0.13) 0.12 (−0.22, 0.45)
4 521 33.94 (0.13) 532 33.64 (0.15) 0.30 (−0.09, 0.69)
Category fluency score
1 1000 16.65 (0.16) 1007 16.32 (0.15) 0.34 (−0.09, 0.76)
2 909 16.82 (0.17) 921 16.49 (0.16) 0.33 (−0.12, 0.79)
3 846 15.65 (0.17) 840 15.33 (0.18) 0.32 (−0.16, 0.80)
4 519 16.46 (0.20) 530 16.57 (0.19) −0.11 (−0.65,0.43)
*

Least squares means and standard errors

From longitudinal linear models of least square means of cognitive performance at each assessment

TICS = Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status;

Verbal score is a composite score of the z-scores of the immediate and delayed recalls of both the TICS 10-word and the East Boston Memory Test;

Global score is a composite score of the z-scores of TICS, immediate and delayed recalls of the East Boston Memory Test, category fluency, delayed recall of the TICS 10-word list