Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Apr;196(4):816–823. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4907

Table 3.

Comparison of the estimated number of radiation-related cancer deaths with the number of colorectal cancer deaths prevented by CT colonography screening every five years (per 100,000): according to microsimulation model and age at screening

Microsimulation model Age at screening Average no. of screens (per person) Colorectal cancer deaths prevented Radiation-induced cancer deaths Benefit-risk ratio (prevented:induced)

(per 100,000) (per 100,000) (95% UL) (95% UL)
MISCAN 50-80 yrs 3.5 2080 60 (30-110) 35:1 (19:1-69:1)
40-80 yrs 4.5 2150 90 (40-150) 24:1 (14:1-54:1)
65-80 yrs 2.0 1620 20 (10-50) 81:1 (32:1-162:1)
50-64 yrs* 2.3 460 40 (30-80) 11:1 (6:1-15:1)
40-49 yrs** 1.8 70 40 (20-80) 2:1 (0.9:1-4:1)
CRC-SPIN 50-80 yrs 3.5 2370 60 (30-110) 40:1 (22:1-79:1)
40-80 yrs 4.5 2500 90 (40-150) 28:1 (17:1-63:1)
65-80 yrs 2.0 1740 20 (10-50) 87:1 (35:1-174:1)
50-64 yrs* 2.3 630 40 (30-80) 16:1 (8:1-21:1)
40-49 yrs** 1.8 130 40 (20-80) 3:1 (2:1-7:1)
SimCRC 50-80 yrs 3.5 2790 60 (30-110) 47:1 (25:1-93:1)
40-80 yrs 4.5 3030 90 (40-150) 34:1 (20:1-76:1)
65-80 yrs 2.0 1820 20 (10-50) 91:1 (36:1-182:1)
50-64 yrs* 2.3 970 40 (30-80) 24:1 (12:1-32:1)
40-49 yrs** 1.8 240 40 (20-80) 6:1 (3:1-12:1)
*

Additional benefit/risk from CT colonography screening age 50-64, assuming screening continues age 65-80.

**

Additional benefit/risk from CT colonography screening age 40-49, assuming screening continues age 50-80.

Radiation risks from screening 40-49, 50-64 and 65-80 do not equal the sum of the risks from screening 40-80 or 50-80 because the total number of CT colonography screens performed is different. UL – uncertainty limits.