Table 3.
Summary of the incidence of revision, presented by mode of failures and in association with each design
| Acetabular Loosening | Femoral Loosening | Femoral neck Fracture | Sepsis | Wear related or ALTR | Instability | Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THARIESa | 86 (25.8%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | N/A | 0 (0%) | 7 (2.1%) | |
| PSRa | 28 (12.6%) | 23 (12.4%) | 1 (0.5%) | N/A | 2 (0.9%) | 28 (12.6%) | |
| MCMINN | 16 (38.1%) | 3 (7.1%) | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (2.4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Conserve Plus 1st generation | 2 (0.7%) | 22 (7.3%) | 4 (1.3%) | 1 (0.3%) | 3 (1%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.3%) |
| Conserve Plus 2nd generation | 5 (1.4)% | 4 (1.1%) | 3 (0.8)% | 0 (0%) | 4 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
aThe information provided by the senior author's database did not allow to differentiate femoral from acetabular aseptic loosening. Also, the values indicated for THARIES and PSR designs are underestimated as information on the mode of failure was missing for a number of hips revised outside our institution