Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 2;15(4):310–326. doi: 10.1007/s10729-012-9193-z

Table 8.

Changes in efficiency after privatization in the DRG era compared to the pre-DRG era

Post-privatization period Matched sample
t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 t + 4
Public->For-profit
2001 cut-off point −0.020 (0.016) −0.019 (0.018) −0.051*** (0.020) 0.012 (0.028)
2002 cut-off point −0.021 (0.014) −0.012 (0.018) −0.037** (0.018) −0.035 (0.022)
2003 cut-off point −0.018 (0.014) −0.032** (0.015) −0.037** (0.018) −0.039** (0.019)
2004 cut-off point −0.026* (0.014) −0.023* (0.015) −0.047*** (0.016) −0.042** (0.018)
Public->Non-profit
2001 cut-off point −0.015 (0.031) −0.001 (0.038) −0.030 (0.031) −0.035 (0.055)
2002 cut-off point −0.015 (0.031) −0.026 (0.037) −0.030 (0.033) −0.057* (0.035)
2003 cut-off point −0.015 (0.031) −0.026 (0.037) −0.050 (0.033) −0.057* (0.035)
2004 cut-off point −0.003 (0.033) −0.049 (0.036) −0.050 (0.033) −0.076** (0.035)

*P ≤ 0.10; **P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.01; SE in parentheses

t − 1 is defined as the year before privatization occurred, while t + 1, t + 2, t + 3 and t + 4 represent the four post-privatization years.