Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Aug 29;135(3):759–769. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2220-4

Table 2.

Correlation analysis of ADAM12L, EGF-like ligands, and EGFR in breast tumors from the EMC286 cohort. Values represent Pearson r.

All
EGF HB-EGF TGFα AREG BTC EREG EGFR
ADAM12L −0.0525 (p = 0.3766) 0.0603 (p = 0.3095) −0.0781 (p = 0.1877) 0.0432 (p = 0.4663) −0.1097 (p = 0.0640) 0.0278 (p = 0.6392) 0.0067 (p = 0.9104)
ER+
EGF HB-EGF TGFα AREG BTC EREG EGFR
ADAM12L −0.0520 (p = 0.4646) −0.0068 (p = 0.9243) −0.1431 (p = 0.0432) 0.0019 (p = 0.9784) −0.1141 (p = 0.1077) 0.0258 (p = 0.7174) 0.0203 (p = 0.7750)
ER−
EGF HB-EGF TGFα AREG BTC EREG EGFR
ADAM12L −0.08296 (p = 0.4476) 0.3038 (p = 0.0045) −0.0214 (p = 0.8446) 0.1193 (p = 0.2738) −0.0497 (p = 0.6493) 0.0006 (p = 0.9954) 0.1703 (p = 0.1169)
TNBC
EGF HB-EGF TGFα AREG BTC EREG EGFR
ADAM12L −0.1004 (p = 0.4744) 0.3632 (p = 0.0075) 0.0504 (p = 0.7202) 0.2246 (p = 0.1060) −0.1060 (p = 0.4500) −0.0276 (p-0.8445) 0.2728 (p = 0.0481)
non-TNBC
EGF HB-EGF TGFα AREG BTC EREG EGFR
ADAM12L −0.1030 (p = 0.5685) 0.2593 (p = 0.1450) −0.2398 (p = 0.1789) 0.0735 (p = 0.6843) 0.1051 (p = 0.5605) 0.1093 (p = 0.5448) 0.1751 (p = 0.3297)