Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 18;96(5):953–961. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.038265

TABLE 3.

Adjusted between-group differences in absolute and relative body weight and waist circumference in participants after 1 y in a commercial weight-loss program (n = 9037) including a VLCD (500 kcal/d), an LCD (1200–1500 kcal/d), or a restricted normal-food diet (1500–1800 kcal/d)1

Between-group differences
VLCD compared with LCD VLCD compared withrestricted normal-food diet LCD compared withrestricted normal-food diet
Intention to treat (n = 9037)2
 Body weight (kg) −2.8 (−3.2, −2.5) −3.8 (−4.5, −3.2) −1.0 (−1.6, −0.4)
 Body weight (%) −3.0 (−3.4, −2.7) −4.3 (−4.9, −3.7) −1.3 (−1.9, −0.7)
 Waist circumference (cm) −3.0 (−3.4, −2.5) −4.1 (−5.0, −3.3) −1.1 (−1.9, −0.3)
Completers only (n = 7109)
 Body weight (kg) −3.0 (−3.3, −2.6) −3.9 (−4.5, −3.3) −1.0 (−1.5, −0.4)
 Body weight (%) −2.9 (−3.3, −2.6) −4.3 (−5.0, −3.7) −1.4 (−2.0, −0.8)
 Waist circumference (cm) −2.1 (−2.5, −1.7) −3.1 (−3.8, −2.4) −1.0 (−1.7, −0.4)
1

All values are estimated marginal means; 95% CIs in parentheses. ANCOVA was conducted, and the values were adjusted for age, sex, baseline BMI, center, calendar year, history of cardiovascular disease and cancer during the past 5 y, and dispensation of drugs for obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, depression, and psychosis during the 6 mo preceding baseline. All between-group differences were P < 0.05. LCD, low-calorie diet; VLCD, very-low-calorie diet.

2

With baseline substitution.