Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2012 Aug 29;141(2-3):247–250. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.001

Table 1.

Decisional capacity scores and quality of consent ratings by diagnosis and consent condition

NC Group (n=16) Schizophrenia Group (n=19)

Variable Routine (n=8) Enhanced (n=8) Test Statistic p-value Routine (n=9) Enhanced (n=10) Test Statistic p-value

Age in years, mean (SD) 52.5 (12.1) 48.6 (15.9) t14=0 .55 0.59 57.0 (10.0) 57.9 (8.9) t17= -0.12 0.90
Education in years, mean (SD) 14.9 (1.6) 16.0 (1.9) t14=-1.29 0.22 12.4(0.9) 11.8 (1.9) t17= 0.92 0.37
Gender, % women 50.0 62.5 X2= 0.25 0.61 11.0 40.0 X2= 2.04 0.15
Ethnic minorities (%) 25.0 25.0 X2= 1.33 0.51 22.2 30.0 X2= 0.95 0.81
UBACC total (potential range 0-20) 19.6 (0.7) 20.0 (0.0) U = 24.00 0.14 15.0 (3.5) 18.2 (3.3) U = 19 0.03
MacCAT- CR
    Understanding (potential range 0-26) 25.0 (1.5) 25.1 (1.6) U = 22.00 0.71 15.3 (6.9) 20.5 (5.9) U = 25 0.10
    Appreciation (potential range 0-6) 6.0 (0.0) 5.7 (0.6) U = 21.00 0.31 4.8 (1.0) 5.2 (1.4) U = 32.5 0.25
    Reasoning (potential range 0-8) 7.4 (1.0) 7.6 (1.5) t12 = -0.34 0.74 5.6 (2.0) 6.3 (0.9) t17= -1.05 0.31
    Expression of a choice (potential range 0-2) 2.0 (0.0) 2.0 (0.0) U = 24.50 1.00 2.0 (0.0) 1.9 (0.3) U = 40.5 0.34
Quality of consent relative to past experience
    Better 17% 60% N/A N/A 25% 44% N/A N/A

Note. UBACC= UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent; MacCAT-CR= MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research