. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 15.

Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul 13;94(5):2999–3008. doi: 10.1152/jn.00732.2004

Table 3.

Power Absorption and Generation

Peak Powers (Nm/kgsec)	p	Control (n=10)	Non-paretic (n=20)	Paretic (n=20)
		Mean (95% CI)	Mean (95% CI)	Mean (95% CI)	FM Correlation
Shoulder Flexor (Concentric)^a	0.002	.306 (.254 to .359)	.278 (.240 to .316)	.198 (.160 to .236)	0.702^**
Shoulder Abductor (Concentric)^a	0.003	.005 (−.007 to .017)	.010 (.001 to .019)	.029 (.020 to .038)	−0.701^**
Elbow Flexor (Eccentric)^a	0.006	−4.184 (−5.466 to −2.903)	−3.379(−4.309 to −2.450)	−1.756 (−2.686 to −.827)	−0.665^**

P-values provided for the significance level of the ANOVA comparing the three arm conditions (control, non-paretic, paretic)

Post-hoc multiple comparison test significantly differentiated descriptor associated with the paretic arm from all other arm groups. Significance of Correlations:

p<.05,

^**

p<.01.

Note that generation and absorption powers have been described in terms of eccentric/concentric to facilitate interpretation.