Skip to main content
. 2012 May 12;41(7):720–737. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y

Table 2.

Studies comparing the ecological aspects of the two management systems, and their evaluation against the criteria on spatial and temporal scales, and the linkage to a theoretical framework

Study Theoretical framework Study type Temporal scalea Spatial scale Study focus
Atlegrim et al. (1997) None Inventory after harvesting Short Stand Ground beetles
Atlegrim and Sjöberg (2004) None Inventory after harvesting Short Stand Deadwood and deciduous trees
Jalonen and Vanha-Majamaa (2001) None Inventory before/after harvesting Short Stand Plant species diversity and cover
Matveinen-Huju and Koivula (2008) Natural disturbance emulation Inventory before/after harvesting Short Stand Ground-dwelling spiders
Siira-Pietikäinen et al. (2003) None Inventory before/after harvesting Short Stand Macroarthropods
Siira-Pietikäinen et al. (2001) None Inventory before/after harvesting Short Stand Soil decomposers
Atlegrim and Sjöberg (1996a) None Inventory after harvesting Short Stand Blueberry abundance
Atlegrim and Sjöberg (1996b) None Inventory after harvesting Short Stand Blueberry-feeding larvae
Koivula (2002) Natural disturbance emulation Inventory before/after harvesting Short Stand + adjacent habitat matrix Carabids
Siira-Pietikäinen and Haimi (2009) None Re-inventory of earlier harvesting Medium Stand Soil decomposers
Shorohova et al. (2008) None Decay modeling Medium Stand Stump decay rates
Lähde et al. (2002) Natural disturbance emulation Inventory before/after harvesting Medium Stand Structural diversity

aShort time-scale: 0–5 years; medium time-scale 5–15 years