Skip to main content
. 2012 May 12;41(7):720–737. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y

Table 3.

Some main properties of studies comparing the economic or timber production performance between even- and uneven-aged management

Study Optimization framework Harvesting cost specification Growth model Ingrowth model Source of BLV Volume outputc Economic outputc
Mikola (1984)a None None Case data None None EA > UEA
Pukkala and Kolström (1988)a None None Transition matrix Usher-type None EA > UEA
Kolström (1993)a None None Transition matrix Usher -type None
Lähde et al. (1994)a None None Inventory data None None EA < UEA
Wikström (2000) Several None Single tree Fixed ingrowth Same framework EA > UEA EA > UEA
Andreassen and Øyen (2002) None Empirical experiment Case data/even-aged model Case data External source EA > UEA EA > UEA
Lähde et al. (2002)a None None Case data None None EA < UEA
Gobakken et al. (2008) None Same for both alternatives Single tree Various explanatory variablesb Same framework EA < UEA Depends on initial stand state
Lexerød and Gobakken (2008) None Same for both alternatives Single tree Various explanatory variablesb Same framework EA < UEA Depends on initial state and discounting
Tahvonen (2009) General dynamic None Transition matrix Usher -type Same framework EA < UEA
Pukkala et al. (2009)a None None Single tree Function of density None EA > UEA
Pukkala et al. (2010) Static None Single tree Function of density External source Depends on site fertility and discounting
Tahvonen et al. (2010) General dynamic Separate for even and uneven Transition matrix Function of density Same framework, external sources EA > UEA EA < UEA
Lähde et al. (2010)a None None Case data None None EA < UEA

aCompares volume yield scenarios only

bAltitude, latitude, site index, age class, number of trees, dominant species

cEA refers to even-aged management and UEA to uneven-aged management