Tab. 2.
A | B | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
N | SRC (SE) | t | p | SRC (SE) | t | p | |
MRT1 | 512 | 0.48 (0.06) | 8.54 | *** | 0.21 (0.04) | 5.24 | *** |
RTV1 | 512 | 0.47 (0.05) | 10.04 | *** | 0.24 (0.03) | 7.42 | *** |
Omission errors %2 | 813 | 0.39 (0.03) | 11.33 | *** | 0.18 (0.02) | 7.38 | *** |
Commission errors %2 | 813 | 0.34 (0.06) | 6.11 | *** | 0.19 (0.04) | 5.09 | *** |
Digit span backwards | 854 | −0.26 (0.07) | −3.92 | *** | −0.14 (0.04) | −3.16 | ** |
Choice impulsivity %3 | 886 | 0.15 (0.05) | 3.25 | ** | 0.06 (0.03) | 2.12 | * |
Immediate drive for impulsive reward4 | 879 | 0.20 (0.05) | 3.70 | *** | 0.08 (0.03) | 2,27 | * |
Delay aversion5 | 867 | 0.04 (0.05) | 0.82 | ns | 0.01 (0.03) | 0.34 | ns |
MRT (event rate effect; ms)6 | 813 | −0.19 (0.03) | −5.51 | *** | −0.08 (0.02) | −3.57 | *** |
RTV (event rate effect; ms)6 | 813 | −0.19 (0.04) | −5.29 | *** | −0.08 (0.02) | −3.23 | ** |
MRT (incentive effect; ms)7 | 526 | −0.13 (0.05) | −2.92 | ** | −0.04 (0.03) | −1.31 | ns |
RTV (incentive effect; ms)7 | 526 | −0.19 (0.05) | −3.76 | *** | −0.07 (0.03) | −2.18 | * |
MRT (event rate + incentive effect; ms)8 | 614 | −0.28 (0.04) | −6.86 | *** | −0.15 (0.03) | −5.44 | *** |
RTV (event rate + incentive effect; ms)8 | 614 | −0.26 (0.04) | −6.78 | *** | −0.16 (0.03) | −6.28 | *** |
Abbreviations: EL, emotional lability; MRT, mean reaction time; RTV, reaction time variability
Mean score (Go/No-go task, slow condition & Fast task, baseline condition);
Mean score of error percentage in the Go/no-go task, slow condition & fast condition;
Percentage of impulsive choices (MIDA task, no-postdelay condition)
Percentage of impulsive choices (MIDA task, postdelay condition)
Difference of percentages of impulsive choices in no-postdelay condition vs. post delay condition (MIDA task)
Go/No-go task; fast -slow condition difference
Go/No-go task; incentive -slow condition difference
Fast task; incentive/fast -baseline condition difference
p ≤ 0.05,
p ≤ 0.01,
p≤0.001
The covariates age, gender and IQ explained 5.4% of EL variance (estimated from a subsample of uncorrelated observations, i. e. no sibling pairs)