Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 16;7(10):e47688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047688

Figure 3. Data from antisaccade tasks.

Figure 3

Comparison of mean±95%CI between 60 normal (non-ESM) subjects and 16 ESMs. A. Antisaccade directional error rate. B. Mean error pro-saccade latency. C. Mean correct antisaccade latency. Note different y-axis scales in B and C.