Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 16;7(10):e46926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046926

Table 2. Size-related QTL identified in two families (CC5 and CC10) of bay scallop.

Trait QTL name LG Position (cM) Confidence interval (cM)# Nearest marker LOD PVE(%) Phenotype means Significance
f1m1 f2m1 f1m2 f2m2
CC5
SL qSL-7 7 6.8 4.0–8.2 AiDD154 2.9 15.3 35.4 34.9 38.8 37.5 ***
SH qSH-7 7 2.5 4.0–7.0 AiEM002 3.1 15.8 34.9 37.7 34.9 37.7 ****
SW qSW-10 10 5.0 0–10.1 AiAD121 3.6 20.5 15.5 17.0 15.5 17.0 ****
TW qTW-5 5 45.8 43.3–47.6 N391 2.7 9.8 38.0 39.7 35.2 36.1 **
qTW-10 10 7.4 0–13.3 AiAD121 4.2 27.7 8.2 8.2 10.7 10.7 ****
CC10
SL qSL-13 13 55.3 52.5–57.3 AIMS003 2.8 10.2 35.9 35.9 38.8 38.8 ***
SH qSH-10 10 27.6 25.3–30.6 AIMS013 2.7 9.5 34.9 34.7 36.9 36.8 **
TW qTW-6 6 32.4 31.5–33.4 AiAD079 2.6 8.9 8.4 8.6 8.9 10.8
qTW-13 13 53.1 52.1–53.9 Asd013 2.6 9.6 8.5 8.5 10.0 10.0 *

SL, shell length; SH, shell height; TW, total weight; PVE, percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL; association between four parental genotypes (f1m1, f2m1, f1m2, f2m2) of markers nearest each QTL peak and mean phenotypic values of each trait was tested by Kruskal-Wallis analysis.

#

Confidence interval at 95% significance;

linkage-group-wide;

genome wide;

*P<0.1, **P<0.05, *** P<0.01, ****P<0.005, ***** P<0.001.