Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2012 Jun 14;82(4):e38–e46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.009

Table 1.

Mobile phone themes and features to facilitate ecological momentary intervention that emerged during focus groups with persons living with HIV (PLH) and mothers.a

Feature PLH (n = 29) Mothers (n = 24)
Completing surveys during the day Considered acceptable, given incentives and ability to customize Considered attractive to some, acceptable to most, especially with the ability to elaborate or reflect on events at the end of the day
Completing surveys in the moment Considered acceptable, given incentives, ability to customize, purpose, and privacy sensitivity Attractive to some, especially with access to a ‘button’ for quick recording of an event
Reminders Important for medication adherence Customization important, random reminders problematic
Goal setting/monitoring Potentially valuable for medication adherence, reducing risky sexual behavior, drug use, and stress Opinions differed on content, some wanted in relation to food, others wanted motivational messaging
Feedback Less opinionated on format Did not want simple data summary
Password protection Attractive and necessary, particularly for drug use and sexual behaviors Not important, some considered it not attractive as they felt it increased user burden
Image capture Context dependent but useful tangible examples were difficult to imagine Attractive, as long as constrained to capture of food
Access to data Less opinionated Through phone
Stress button Not discussed Suggested by mothers
Peer support Attractive to a few Considered acceptable, especially with the ability to customize reminder timing
Data sharing Attractive to some, especially if anonymized; does depend on question content Attractive to some, especially with control over which data will be shared (e.g., a button at the bottom of a screen that keeps responses private)
a

Themes were generally classified into one of four categories to identify ‘highest’ level of interest for each feature: attractive, acceptable, not acceptable, not important. participant, or anticipated times and locations of risk potential (e.g., weekend evenings in clubs or bars).