Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Mar;21(3):598–601. doi: 10.1038/oby.2012.143

Table 1.

Mean participant weight (kg), self-efficacy, self-esteem, and peer support during the exergame program by condition.

Weight (kg) Self-Efficacy Self-Esteem Peer Support

Baseline Time 2 Time 3 Baseline Time 2 Time 3 Baseline Time 2 Time 3 Baseline Time 2 Time 3

Cooperative 93.93
(26.02)
n = 19
92.96
(25.66)
n = 19
84.74
(14.23)
n = 10
38.16
(12.12)
n = 19
42.11
(13.58)
n = 18
43.29
(13.40)
n = 14
22.79
(4.45)
n = 19
22.67
(5.91)
n = 18
24.08
(3.88)
n = 13
71.89
(12.43)
n = 19
75.22
(13.39)
n = 18
80.18
(8.59)
n = 11
Competitive 96.22
(17.92)
n = 19
96.02
(18.88)
n = 19
95.17
(20.94)
n = 17
36.37
(13.97)
n = 19
37.65
(10.03)
n = 17
38.82
(8.82)
n = 11
23.74
(6.47)
n = 19
23.11
(4.78)
n = 18
22.33
(5.74)
n = 9
64.37
(19.58)
n = 19
72.44
(10.78)
n = 18
76.92
(14.04)
n = 13
Control 95.48
(22.72)
n = 16
95.57
(23.66)
n = 16
94.23
(20.88)
n = 12
37.38
(12.07)
n = 16
34.57
(11.75)
n = 14
35.30
(8.76)
n = 10
22.69
(3.96)
n = 16
22.40
(5.38)
n = 15
20.45
(5.82)
n = 11
70.13
(18.16)
n = 16
72.33
(17.15)
n = 15
59.70
(20.67)
n = 10
Total 95.20
(22.05)
n = 54
94.81
(22.47)
n = 54
92.21
(19.46)
n = 39
37.30
(12.56)
n = 54
38.41
(12.08)
n = 49
39.60
(11.09)
n = 35
23.09
(5.06)
n = 54
22.75
(5.28)
n = 51
22.39
(5.19)
n = 33
68.72
(16.94)
n = 54
73.39
(13.39)
n = 51
72.91
(16.95)
n = 34

Note. Standard deviation indicated in parentheses. The growth curve analysis results, which also include predicted means at Time 3 for missing participants, are not reported here. Instead, each cell reports the mean and standard deviation only for remaining participants at that time point.