Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 28;136(1):267–275. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2257-4

Table 1.

Distribution of PCBs in breast cancer controls and cases

Classification [24] PCB Controls (N = 117) Cases (N = 123) Difference within matched pairs (case–control, N = 112) Percent > LOD
Percentile (mmol/l) Percentile (mmol/l)
25th 50th 75th 25th 50th 75th Mean (mmol/l) p value
Estrogenic 101 0.37 0.74 1.07 0.34 0.55 0.92 −0.06 0.19 89
187 0.38 0.48 0.66 0.38 0.48 0.63 −0.07 0.30 100
201 0.09 0.23 0.33 0.14 0.23 0.30 −0.01 0.71 71
Anti-estrogenic
 A. Non-ortho, mono-ortho, dioxin-like 66 0.89 1.34 1.78 0.96 1.47 1.95 0.10 0.17 99
74 0.62 0.89 1.23 0.62 0.86 1.27 0.01 0.54 95
105 0.25 0.40 0.64 0.25 0.43 0.61 −0.01 0.92 81
118 1.19 1.62 2.02 1.19 1.53 2.11 −0.03 0.94 100
156 0.11 0.28 0.42 0.11 0.28 0.39 −0.03 0.68 64
167 0.08 0.19 0.30 0.08 0.14 0.25 −0.03 0.12 49
 B. Di-ortho, limited dioxin activity 138 1.58 2.05 2.55 1.50 2.02 2.77 −0.09 0.56 100
170 0.30 0.46 0.66 0.35 0.48 0.63 −0.01 0.74 97
Phenobarbital, CYP1A, and CYP2B inducers 99 0.28 0.58 0.80 0.25 0.52 0.86 −0.04 0.30 83
153 1.88 2.38 3.08 1.86 2.43 3.08 −0.08 0.40 100
180 0.89 1.21 1.54 0.94 1.21 1.57 0.01 0.63 100
183 0.13 0.23 0.35 0.10 0.23 0.33 −0.03 0.32 66
203 0.21 0.30 0.42 0.23 0.35 0.47 0.02 0.20 90
203/167 + 187 0.34 0.43 0.52 0.38 0.50 0.63 0.09 NA NA

Variable number of subjects in each group is due to missing data on one or more of the PCB congeners shown. The PCB score (PCB 203/(PCB 187 + PCB 167)) was based on the best fitting model as described in the text, and is provided to describe the distribution of the mixture of significant PCB predictors. p values are not presented for the PCB score because the score was created after analysis, as described in text. p values shown are for Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test of differences (case–control) within age-matched case–control pairs

LOD limit of detection