Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 8;13:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-96

Table 2.

Number of classification errors for all simulated examples and overlapping spike shapes

Example no. Noise level
Number of overlapping spikes
False matches
N°.
%
1 2 3 4
1.
1
[0.05]
785
161
20.5
2.
[0.10]
769
146
19.0
3.
[0.15]
784
185
23.6
4.
[0.20]
796
165
20.7
5.
[0.25]
712
208
29.2
6.
[0.30]
846
250
29.6
7.
[0.35]
832
270
32.5
8.
[0.40]
741
270
36.4
9.
2
[0.05]
791
152
19.2
10.
[0.10]
826
167
20.2
11.
[0.15]
763
152
19.9
12.
[0.20]
811
301
37.1
13.
3
[0.05]
767
88
11.5
14.
[0.10]
810
131
16.2
15.
[0.15]
812
152
18.7
16.
[0.20]
790
287
36.3
17.
4
[0.05]
829
39
4.7
18
[0.10]
720
114
15.8
19.
[0.15]
809
209
25.8
20.
[0.20]
777
282
36.3
Average 789 186 23.7

Noise level is represented in terms of its standard deviation relative to the peak amplitude of the spikes. All spike classes had a peak value of 1. The absolute number of false matching spikes is shown in column 3 as the outcome of our algorithm corresponding to the datasets containing overlapped spikes (column 2).