Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep;84(1005):826–832. doi: 10.1259/bjr/14335925

Table 2. Comparison of perfusion parameters after treatment.

Group A (n = 9) Group B (n = 10) Group C (n = 10) p of ANOVA
AUC (a.u.) 9590.33±5372.34 4689.35±2428.39 5384.69±2309.38 0.025
MTT (s) 175.22±80.08 181.78±100.33 224.29±91.35 0.448
PI (a.u. s–1) 54.81±17.81 32.03±21.45 25.33±14.66 0.004
TTP (s) 10.98±2.77 9.23±3.33 11.31±4.35 0.392
IMAX (a.u.) 100.19±36.57 57.52±23.13 50.50±25.51 0.002
QOF (%) 90.23±4.10 90.81±4.72 85.56±6.35 0.064

Data are presented as means ± standard deviations.

ANOVA, analysis of variance; AUC, area under the curve; MTT, mean transit time; PI, perfusion index; TTP, mean transit time; IMAX, maximum intensity; QOF, quality of fit.