Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;84(997):19–30. doi: 10.1259/bjr/92960562

Table 3. Association between types of lesions on sonograms and prognostic factors.

Type of lesion on sonogram and prognostic factor Number (%) OR 95% CI p-value
Extensive intraductal component <0.001*
Oval masses without calcifications 49/280 (18) Reference NA
Oval masses with calcifications 23/48 (48) 4.34 2.28, 8.26 <0.001*
Irregular masses without calcifications 59/260 (23) 1.38 0.91, 2.11 0.133
Irregular masses with calcifications 66/119 (55) 5.87 3.65, 9.44 <0.001*
Calcifications alone 7/8 (88) 33.00 3.97, 274.34 0.001*
Positive HER-2/neu status <0.001*
Oval masses without calcifications 45/280 (16) Reference NA
Oval masses with calcifications 22/48 (46) 4.42 2.30, 8.48 <0.001*
Irregular masses without calcifications 50/260 (19) 1.24 0.80, 1.94 0.336
Irregular masses with calcifications 46/119 (39) 3.29 2.02, 5.36 <0.001*
Calcifications alone 2/8 (25) 1.74 0.34, 8.90 0.506

NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.

*These were considered to be statistically significant parameters.

Note – Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the ORs of the sonographic types for a specific prognostic factor. For the explanatory variables, we have chosen “oval masses without calcifications” as the reference for the other sonographic types in order to determine ORs that predict a specific prognostic factor.